BUR #58041 has been rejected.
convert pool:6136 -> unconventional_riding
create implication unconventional_riding -> riding
Not too sure about the name, but I do believe "riding something unusual" is a fairly objective concept.
Posted under Tags
BUR #58041 has been rejected.
convert pool:6136 -> unconventional_riding
create implication unconventional_riding -> riding
Not too sure about the name, but I do believe "riding something unusual" is a fairly objective concept.
I'll miss this pool, but yeah I also +1 for unconventional_steed.
BUR #58081 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
convert pool:6136 -> unconventional_steed
create implication unconventional_steed -> riding
"Unconventional Steed" sounds good to me. Better than what first sprang to mind for me lol.
BUR #58092 has been rejected.
create alias "onward_my_trusty_steed!" -> unconventional_steed
create alias unconventional_riding -> unconventional_steed
Some utility aliases while at it, one of them being the pool name for maximum clarity. Must be approved after the OG BUR.
Knowledge_Seeker said in forum #434520:
BUR #58092 has been rejected.
create alias "onward_my_trusty_steed!" -> unconventional_steed
create alias unconventional_riding -> unconventional_steedSome utility aliases while at it, one of them being the pool name for maximum clarity. Must be approved after the OG BUR.
We don't use quotes for phrases, that alias would be fine without them.
Also not sure about the riding implication, a character could be shown in the process of getting onto its steed.
There's also things like post #7034942 in the pool, which reference the riding gesture. Are we fine with this being tagged with unconventional steed?
I put an implication request in mostly because the goal of the pool is to show a character actually riding the weird thing. As I haven't seen any posts that would contradict the implication going through, I assume the implication will be perfectly fine. A character climbing onto a steed sounds like a very niche thing in my opinion. Though if we don't want the implication, we don't want the implication.
nonamethanks said in forum #434951:
We don't use quotes for phrases, that alias would be fine without them.
Oops, forgot lol. Alas, we're past the threshold for a quick spelling correction...
There's also things like post #7034942 in the pool, which reference the riding gesture. Are we fine with this being tagged with unconventional steed?
I feel like post #7034942 and others like it ought to be removed, as they are not riding anything, and would be a mistag were this a tag.
Knowledge_Seeker said in forum #435088:
I feel like post #7034942 and others like it ought to be removed, as they are not riding anything, and would be a mistag were this a tag.
Then we end up without a tag for the pointing gesture that gives the name to the pool.
nonamethanks said in forum #435117:
Then we end up without a tag for the pointing gesture that gives the name to the pool.
Guess that just means creating a new tag for it then.I intitially thought pointing forward could work, but since we're here...
What about onward gesture?
The bulk update request #58081 (forum #434487) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #58041 (forum #434332) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #58092 (forum #434520) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
Yes, it needs to be cleaned up, like many of these pools, due to years of misuse. A horse-like animal from a famous copyright that's always shown as being ridden and has thousands of posts is just pollution. We should still have an onward gesture tag for the gesture.
Might be worth also making a tag for "dignified" riding, like characters riding something silly with more seriousness than it deserves.