imply house -> building

BUR #44753 has been rejected.

create implication house -> building

Read the wiki

Do you think other place tags like castle, church, mosque, synagogue, etc. should also imply as well?

On the one hand, all of those are technically buildings.

On the other hand, when I think of the word “building,” I often think of the large rectangular buildings in modern cities, so I don’t know if we should make these implications. If we had a generic city building tag for those (we have similar tags like apartment and skyscraper, but they’re more specific), I’d be more willing to support this.

I think building, in the sense of "any immobile artificial structure", is too broad and encompasses too diverse a set to be useful. It's a little like tagging every depiction of a living creature with organism.

One could argue that by definition, indoors ought to imply building.

Black_Metal_ist_Krieg said:

Do you think other place tags like castle, church, mosque, synagogue, etc. should also imply as well?

I thinked, but some of these are indoors.

house indoors. Also building sounds like padding.

The bulk update request #44753 (forum #373495) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

BUR #57375 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication gazebo -> pavilion
create implication pergola -> pavilion

implications of 2 structure

kiosk is also being used for things like post #9499037.

ohhh (fixed)

The bulk update request #57375 (forum #430872) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

We probably need to split kiosk given that it's ambiguous.

got it
add examples