imply blowing_smoke -> smoke

BUR #9109 has been rejected.

create implication blowing_smoke -> smoke

Can't blow smoke without smoke being visible.

finger_gun blowing_smoke has a few cases that would disprove this implication.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #9109 (forum #206829) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

BUR #57385 has been rejected.

create implication blowing_smoke -> smoke
create implication blowing_smoke_on_another -> blowing_smoke

then they're mistagged. how do you blow smoke without smoke? even if you're blowing smoke that isn't coming out of your mouth that is still smoke.

btw should this imply blowing?

trapster77 said in forum #431159:

then they're mistagged.

Then how do you expect people to find posts of someone blowing smoke off a finger gun?

Regardless, blowing smoke should be split into exhaling smoke and blowing off the (real or imaginary) smoke from a (real or imaginary) gun. topic #35870.

The bulk update request #57385 (forum #431159) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.