No.
Posted under General
Can someone please check post #11191280
Rating: Questionable
ggraphy said in forum #434122:
Can someone please check post #11191280
it doesn't quite look like loli to me
Placeholder1996 said in forum #434700:
post #11212945 I'm a little unsure if loli/shota should apply here. They're completely clothed, but they're also reacting to the nudity around them. My thought is no, but I can't decide for certain.
No, it doesn't count as loli/shota. As long as the children are fully covered it's fine. There are quite a few child rating:explicit posts in the same vein.
parent:11211784
I don't think it's a loli, not the base variant at least.
post #11215399
loli-check
Explicit
ggraphy said in forum #434820:
Explicit
yeah that's loli
post #11227981
hard for me to tell due to the angle minimizing the features, tagged to be safe but I was thinking she may possibly be too big for loli.
gxc425 said in forum #434968:
Not sexually suggestive or explicit, I'd tag with child
post #11234347
post #11234818
^ General
post #11234135
post #11234365 and #11234369
post #post #11234966 (loli or child?)
^ Sensitive
post #11239253 (loli or child?)
post #11231311
^ Between Sensitive and Questionable
post #11234042
^ Between Questionable and Explicit
post #11234334 and post #11234336
post #11234830 and post #11234833
post #11234198
post #11234095
post #11234806
^ Explicit
Updated by ggraphy
Tagged as such for now because of proportions, but I can remove if necessary
@ggraphy Please review the wikis for child and loli before asking here again. There is no way post #11234347 is loli and post #11234966 and post #11239253 definitely shouldn't be tagged with child. Anyone tagged as child in an image has to be presented in a 100% SFW manner. However, that does not necessarily mean the loli tag is necessary. For example, I wouldn't use either tag for your S examples (post #11234135, post #11234365, and post #11234369).
Also, review howto:rate. Neither post #11234830 nor post #11234833 should be rated E; all you see is her upper body. And some of the posts you're rating G really aren't SFW enough to deserve that rating.
Updated by Blank User
Blank_User said in forum #435370:
@ggraphy Please review the wikis for child and loli before asking here again. There is no way post #11234337 is loli and post #11234966 and post #11239253 definitely shouldn't be tagged with child. Anyone tagged as child in an image has to be presented in a 100% SFW manner. However, that does not necessarily mean the loli tag is necessary. For example, I wouldn't use either tag for your S examples (post #11234135, post #11234365, and post #11234369).
Also, review howto:rate. Neither post #11234830 nor post #11234833 should be rated E; all you see is her upper body. And some of the posts you're rating G really aren't SFW enough to deserve that rating.
Hey, thanks for taking the time to write this in detail, I think the first post you have mentioned is faulty, but for the rest I will take into mind what you have said. The reason why I'm asking here is because I want to make sure what I've tagged is correct. It turns out that it wasn't, so I'll count it as this thread fulfilling it's purpose.
The confusing part to me is how post #11234135, post #11234365, and post #11234369 would not get either tag. Do they get petite instead? I'd appreciate a pointer on that regard.
Coming to post #11234830 and post #11234833 yeah, those seem to have missed my attention by accident. I am aware that E rated posts must provide sexual acts or exposed genitals so my bad.
Thank you for taking your time to take a look at them.
ggraphy said in forum #435371:
Hey, thanks for taking the time to write this in detail, I think the first post you have mentioned is faulty,
Sorry, I meant post #11234347. I fixed it. But yeah, that one looks pretty SFW to me.
The confusing part to me is how post #11234135, post #11234365, and post #11234369 would not get either tag. Do they get petite instead? I'd appreciate a pointer on that regard.
They can't be tagged child because they're in bikinis, which show off too much skin, and are thus not completely SFW. However, there's nothing overtly sexual about how they're depicted (no suggestive poses, close-ups, or gratuitous skin exposure) so this is at most borderline for loli. That's why I think it's fine for them to have neither tag.
Petite is meant to be used on characters that show slight development. I'm not sure whether any of these are developed enough to count. But my main point is that there will sometimes be situations in which no tags fit. We have to be strict with how we use child and loli because the proper usage of both is essential to the well-being of the site. It's better for some things to be untagged than it is for those tags to be used incorrectly.
Blank_User said in forum #435382:
They can't be tagged child because they're in bikinis, which show off too much skin, and are thus not completely SFW. However, there's nothing overtly sexual about how they're depicted (no suggestive poses, close-ups, or gratuitous skin exposure) so this is at most borderline for loli. That's why I think it's fine for them to have neither tag.
Petite is meant to be used on characters that show slight development. I'm not sure whether any of these are developed enough to count. But my main point is that there will sometimes be situations in which no tags fit. We have to be strict with how we use child and loli because the proper usage of both is essential to the well-being of the site. It's better for some things to be untagged than it is for those tags to be used incorrectly.
I think I understand it fully now. There has been many cases where I've felt in between child and loli thinking I must definitely tag it but just leaving it out did not come to mind so now it kind of clicked (I was battering up in my mind reading the wiki page over and over again debating if they are depicted sexually or not for many posts).
Sorry, I meant post #11234347. I fixed it. But yeah, that one looks pretty SFW to me.
For that post I was between tagging as child or not before due to the mentality of feeling like I must tag that. I'll just leave it as is now.
Thank you once again for following up and taking the time to explain this to me. I'll be much more careful going on forward.