BUR #57566 has been rejected.
create implication fang_out -> closed_mouth
create implication fangs_out -> closed_mouth
Just following the wikis' definitions of both.
Posted under Tags
BUR #57566 has been rejected.
create implication fang_out -> closed_mouth
create implication fangs_out -> closed_mouth
Just following the wikis' definitions of both.
If stuff like post #2540475 counts the implication wouldn't work, or if a character has the mouth slightly open in one end of the lips while the fang points out in the other end (I tried looking for an example but I couldn't find any)
Mars49 said in forum #432500:
BUR #57566 has been rejected.
create implication fang_out -> closed_mouth
create implication fangs_out -> closed_mouthJust following the wikis' definitions of both.
I'm gonna reject it myself seeing the old topics, but I think wiki should be updated to include parted_lips.
Sorry for the bothering.
The bulk update request #57566 (forum #432500) has been rejected by @Mars49.