Loli/shota check thread.

post #11103516

LuxuryRay said in forum #430646:

post #11103516

No. There's nothing sexual at all about this. And why would you rate it G if you thought it might qualify for loli?

Just to be clear, I think the G rating is fine for this post, but if you have good reason to suspect loli might apply to a post, then you should rate it as at least S.

Edit: After translating it, it seems like she might be talking about her breasts, but she's being pretty vague about it, so I don't know if that's enough on its own to raise the rating. Still wouldn't qualify for loli, though.

post #10808146
post #11112968

The second one slipped my blacklist because it was both untagged and rated S and I accidentally approved it because I clicked too fast.

Does post #11106355 qualify?

Mass removal of shota tag by a single user (see here). All of these need to be double-checked.

Generally speaking, this user seems to have a weak understanding of how to properly use child and shota.

Also, there's one banned child loli post I can't edit. Can someone of Approver rank or higher fix it?

ion288 said in forum #432000:

Does post #11106355 qualify?

yes, I added it. I'd say the proportions on the bottom left view justifies it

Blank_User said in forum #432021:

Mass removal of shota tag by a single user (see here). All of these need to be double-checked.

Generally speaking, this user seems to have a weak understanding of how to properly use child and shota.

Also, there's one banned child loli post I can't edit. Can someone of Approver rank or higher fix it?

added it back on the ones I'm very confident in

Loli? post #11114822

Drimacus said in forum #432047:

Loli? post #11114822

Proportions are weird. The male hand on her thigh makes her look relatively larger and her body has development. But her oversized head makes her look little. I would say tag it out of caution.

Freshblink said in forum #432059:

Proportions are weird. The male hand on her thigh makes her look relatively larger and her body has development. But her oversized head makes her look little. I would say tag it out of caution.

If it's just the head, then I think petite is fine.

post #11117056
Loli check. Doesn't seem all that suggestive except maybe the slightly emphasized ass.

post #11123590

Can this be considered loli?

VR-Man said in forum #432420:

post #11123590

Can this be considered loli?

No,with this body length

post #10705021
loli check

post #11126284
Loli check.

No.

post #11090715

Placeholder1996 said in forum #432898:

post #11090715

No. Too much development.

Blank_User said in forum #432901:

No. Too much development.

I thought as much when I posted it, but someone else added the tag later. Wanted to double check

post #11146422
The character is a loli, but in this image it doesn't look so much like one.