Posted under Tags
BUR #57328 has been rejected.
mass update favgroup:53908 -> stealth_crossdressing_(mtf)
create implication stealth_crossdressing_(mtf) -> crossdressing_(mtf)
a tag for boys seen wearing feminine underwear hidden under their masculine overwear so it's like stealth bondage but for crossdressing (mtf)
ANON_TOKYO said in forum #430394:
Does it really need a qualifier?
If we use "crossdressing" in the tag name yes, since we split crossdressing into mtf and ftm. I guess post #1517118 post #8049980 would be some ftm examples, but since it's pretty socially acceptable for women to wear "male" clothes it doesn't really have the same vibe.
With a name like this I'd expect it to be slapped on every picture of Astolfo (Fate). Is the idea that the crossdressing is getting revealed? That might be a better idea that could also apply to women, but then again that's already trap is:nsfw/reverse_trap is:nsfw.
The bulk update request #57328 (forum #429791) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
BUR #58208 has been rejected.
mass update favgroup:53908 -> female_underwear_under_male_clothing
nonamethanks said in forum #434927:
With a name like this I'd expect it to be slapped on every picture of Astolfo (Fate). Is the idea that the crossdressing is getting revealed? That might be a better idea that could also apply to women, but then again that's already trap is:nsfw/reverse_trap is:nsfw.
The creator of the thread clearly meant that it wasn't just any femboy, but someone in men's clothes with women's underwear.
The following post cannot be called a trap by any criteria.
post #10855291
"Stealth," unfortunately, already has connotations that are quite opposite to those suggested for the tag. So a tag with this name sounds more like something for posts like this one.
http://stealth.urbanup.com/2580191
A behavior in the transsexual community where a fully transitioned person lives completely as their new gender and does not reveal that they are transsexual.
A transsexual person may 'go stealth' in order to avoid transphobia and bigotry, or simply because they wish to be seen as simply male or female and not transsexual.
Jason is stealth. No one knows he wasn't born male.
post #7548856 (There is "stealth" towards other people in the restaurant, but not towards the character whose point of view we are adopting)
post #5920978
So I suggest a different name. It might need some refinement – I'm afraid it will be flooded with posts featuring women, like the one below.
post #6536908
Updated by てはいさ
The name would need to include crossdressing if you want to 100% exclude women. Something like crossdressing under clothes (mtf)?
BUR #58211 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
mass update favgroup:53908 -> crossdressing_under_clothes_(mtf)
mass update id:7849560 -> crossdressing_under_clothes_(mtf)
PersonalFowl said in forum #434982:
The name would need to include crossdressing if you want to 100% exclude women. Something like crossdressing under clothes (mtf)?
Oh, that might be a better idea. Plus, I didn't consider that bikinis, for example, would also count, so my suggestion wouldn't work.
てはいさ said in forum #434990:
BUR #58211 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
mass update favgroup:53908 -> crossdressing_under_clothes_(mtf)
mass update id:7849560 -> crossdressing_under_clothes_(mtf)Oh, that might be a better idea. Plus, I didn't consider that bikinis, for example, would also count, so my suggestion wouldn't work.
This name seems a lot clearer and less clunky to me, while still being pretty descriptive.
The bulk update request #58211 (forum #434990) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #58208 (forum #434972) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
Should the post below and the tag below count?
post #1933043
half-dressed_in_the_mirror_(meme)
BUR #58410 is pending approval.
create implication crossdressing_under_clothes_(mtf) -> crossdressing_(mtf)
missing implication
