Posted under Tags
nonamethanks said in forum #426056:
BUR #56973 has been rejected.
create alias genderswap_unaware -> genderswap_clueless
Maybe, though I'm not too sold on this. Also it's kind of a counterpart to the genderswap aware proposed above, so they would mismatch as tags.
The aware tag BUR was created after my proposals. Iโm all for keeping unaware if the aware/unaware dualism is approved (related BUR #56965).
ใฆใฏใใ said in forum #425999:
BUR #56965 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
mass update favgroup:53667 -> genderswap_aware
As I mentioned, here is a sample of posts for the tag I suggested.
Looking in the favgroup, I think post #4600146 is meant to be a male crossdressing as female, not a genderswap.
The bulk update request #56973 (forum #426056) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
aster1a said in forum #426286:
Looking in the favgroup, I think post #4600146 is meant to be a male crossdressing as female, not a genderswap.
Removed
Can I use the "character_and_genderswap" tag in this case? Characters with a player-selectable gender, no default gender
๐ด๐ฃ๐๐ said in forum #426450:
Can I use the "character_and_genderswap" tag in this case? Characters with a player-selectable gender, no default gender
No, they don't count. They must have a gender by default.
We could make a tag for "both selectable characters are available", or for multiple genderswaps of the same character being present in the picture. character_and_genderswap is for when the original is present, so it would be weird for it to be used on that.
nonamethanks said in forum #426529:
We could make a tag for "both selectable characters are available", or for multiple genderswaps of the same character being present in the picture. character_and_genderswap is for when the original is present, so it would be weird for it to be used on that.
So like post #209585?
What about characters with two canonical genders who are nevertheless not "choosable"?
post #7420889
The original gender is considered the one they're being genderswapped from. We don't tag those as genderswap simply because they would swamp the tag otherwise, but it's fine to tag with character and genderswap, especially if the picture is centered about the concept of genderswapping itself.
BUR #57115 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias fake_gender_select -> double_other_genderswap
I think this is a terrible name for what we're trying to tag, at minimum it needs utility aliases and at best it should be renamed.
The bulk update request #57115 (forum #426614) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #56894 (forum #425842) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #56965 (forum #425999) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #58463 is pending approval.
create implication fully_genderswapped_group -> genderswap
If this tag is to stay, it should be given an appropriate implication
The bulk update request #55993 (forum #422803) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
DanbooruBot said in forum #436303:
The bulk update request #55993 (forum #422803) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
What was wrong with that?
