Roblox implications

Welp, didn't think we'd ever need this thread but I think it's about time to make implications of all of the Roblox experience copyrights on this site (along with whatever else that's related to Roblox) since you can't have experience copyright tags left alone like that without using the Roblox copyright tag as well. Using one without the other is a big oof.

BUR #56656 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication phighting! -> roblox
create implication tower_defense_simulator -> roblox
create implication forsaken_(roblox) -> roblox
create implication pressure_(roblox) -> roblox

I'm not sure if Dandy's World really needs one since it's quite removed from the vanilla Roblox character (and otherwise) design.

Makes sense, good luck with the BUR

HyperOcram151817 said in forum #425041:

I'm not sure if Dandy's World really needs one since it's quite removed from the vanilla Roblox character (and otherwise) design.

I feel like this could be said about most of the copyrights mentioned. I could maybe see the argument for Forsaken, since the characters are based off Roblox myths, but still disagree with the implication. Most of these drawings rarely look like Roblox, and in situations where they are portrayed blocky then Roblox should be tagged. Just reminds me of the Ninjago discussion in forum #414238

Just remembered Chance and Two Time. Those are entirely original characters with 0 ties to Roblox lore, so I don't think it would make sense to tag those as Roblox characters...

My problem is that even if the characters don't look blocky, these Roblox copytags are all something I am interested in excluding most days. The easiest way to do that would be to imply them to the base Roblox tag.

But as Roblox copyrights aren't big enough nor bother me enough to kick up much a fuss, do whatever makes the most sense for the copytags. Just wanted to try proposing a bit of a different perspective in favor of implication.

It creeps into Nintendo-as-umbrella territory, but eh, it's small anyway.

The bulk update request #56656 (forum #425041) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

nonamethanks said in forum #426053:

It creeps into Nintendo-as-umbrella territory, but eh, it's small anyway.

I didn't suggest this before due to similar concerns, but I'm sure many other people would like to blacklist all roblox-related games.

Remuan said in forum #425136:

Just remembered Chance and Two Time. Those are entirely original characters with 0 ties to Roblox lore, so I don't think it would make sense to tag those as Roblox characters...

They don't have 0 ties to roblox lore though, Chance is based on the concept of trading limiteds and Two Time is based on the spawn.