unimply naked_dogeza -> dogeza

Posted under Tags

trapster77

nonamethanks said in forum #423766:

BUR #56282 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

remove implication naked_dogeza -> dogeza
mass update naked_dogeza zarei -id:2196973 -> -dogeza

We now have zarei (topic #35222), so it can't imply.

imo it would be confusing if a tag called "naked dogeza" didn't actually imply dogeza.

there is some posts like post #10776188 which are in the same "style" but with seiza instead. maybe it should be a separate tag called naked seiza?

afaik this is a 3 tag search right? nude seiza folded_clothes

Reply
nonamethanks

Maybe, but if we really wanted to split them, which is debatable, then we'd need an additional umbrella tag for the whole concept. naked dogeza is already an umbrella tag at the moment, because that's the best I could come up with back when I created this tag, and I didn't realize there was a common variant of them doing seiza.

Maybe we could just call it naked prostration, but then that would call in question why we need dogeza/seiza variants when we can just search for naked prostration + the corresponding tag.

Reply
1