alias futadom -> femdom

BUR #56238 has been rejected.

create alias futadom -> femdom

because we only tag futasub. i do think futasub is a bad tag and it should be just futadom instead but i'll let someone into futas handle that

can someone explain the downvotes on this BUR? we have 1k posts tagged futanari and femdom and futas are tagged 1girl. is futadom not supposed to be tagged femdom? if that's the case should we have a futadom tag for futas domming?

we don't have a separate futadom tag so it's being tagged as femdom. if that's not supposed to happen i'll have to go fix the wiki.

I don't imagine femdom enjoyers want to be seeing futanari in their searches the same way you aren't supposed to tag yuri on futanari posts. The wiki right now says it does include futanari but has anyone ever asked if it shouldn't and if it's worth being a separate concept?

ETA: Actually, below is probably more accurate.

trapster77 said in forum #423495:

i do think futasub is a bad tag and it should be just futadom instead but i'll let someone into futas handle that

this is the presumed default clause at work, same reason why we have male focus but not female focus, or femdom but not maledom. it's my understanding that futanari are depicted as the dominant party 90% of the time.

i see. i guess i assumed wrong then. i've reverted the wiki but if that's true it should probably say the tag shouldn't be used with dominant futanari instead.

So what you mean to tell me is that you just went ahead and changed the definition of a tag on your own AGAIN and what I was reading was what you changed instead of what the actual tag is for? I don't get why you do these things without discussing them.

BUR #56274 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

remove implication lolidom -> femdom
mass update futa_with_male femdom -futa_with_female -> -femdom
mass update futa_with_female femdom -futasub -> -femdom
mass update femdom futa_with_futa -futa_with_female -futa_with_male -> -femdom

futasub exists because the default is dominant futanari. Futanari should also probably be excluded from femdom because otherwise femdom will include both dominant futanari and submissive futanari, and, among other reasons, futa_with_female femdom would be a useless search.

I guess this means lolidom must unimply femdom too because lolidom also applies to futanari loli.

The BUR above should take care of the bad posts, but the third line in particular (~500 posts) should be double checked to make sure there's no mistags. futasub can be added to the appropriate posts under it to make sure they're not caught by the update.

The bulk update request #56238 (forum #423495) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

nonamethanks said in forum #423696:

BUR #56274 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

remove implication lolidom -> femdom
mass update futa_with_male femdom -futa_with_female -> -femdom
mass update futa_with_female femdom -futasub -> -femdom
mass update femdom futa_with_futa -futa_with_female -futa_with_male -> -femdom

futasub exists because the default is dominant futanari. Futanari should also probably be excluded from femdom because otherwise femdom will include both dominant futanari and submissive futanari, and, among other reasons, futa_with_female femdom would be a useless search.

I guess this means lolidom must unimply femdom too because lolidom also applies to futanari loli.

The BUR above should take care of the bad posts, but the third line in particular (~500 posts) should be double checked to make sure there's no mistags. futasub can be added to the appropriate posts under it to make sure they're not caught by the update.

i think this will lead to posts being tagged lolidom without femdom

how is futa_with_female femdom different from futa_with_female futasub? the only scenario i can imagine is ffd threesome that is also yuri femdom?

do you mean that every post with a futa and a female is going to be tagged femdom?

i think this will lead to posts being tagged lolidom without femdom

It also took me awhile to grasp, but the main goal is to keep futa out of femdom entirely.
Some lolidom is futa. So those posts shouldn't be under femdom.

Non-futa lolidom is still femdom, so as a follow-up, we could do something like mass update lolidom futanari -> -femdom or mass update lolidom -futanari -> femdom. Or at least that idea might make the original BUR easier to understand.

how is futa_with_female femdom different from futa_with_female futasub? the only scenario i can imagine is ffd threesome that is also yuri femdom?

If we kept femdom on futa with female, it would have too much futa, as futa is almost always femdom.

do you mean that every post with a futa and a female is going to be tagged femdom?

No; it does the opposite by removing femdom.

Non-futa lolidom is still femdom, so as a follow-up, we could do something like mass update lolidom futanari -> -femdom or mass update lolidom -futanari -> femdom. Or at least that idea might make the original BUR easier to understand.

+1 (I like this as it makes it easier to understand on from my perspective)

BUR #56737 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication futasub -> futanari

Missing implication

The bulk update request #56737 (forum #425328) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #56274 (forum #423696) has been approved by @nonamethanks.