Fire Emblem implications

Posted under Tags

Fenton said in forum #415892:

BUR #54117 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication male_mark_(fire_emblem:_the_blazing_blade) -> mark_(fire_emblem:_the_blazing_blade)
create implication female_mark_(fire_emblem:_the_blazing_blade) -> mark_(fire_emblem:_the_blazing_blade)

Mark's gender is ambiguous like Kiran from Fire Emblem Heroes, so these tags need to be implicated as well.

We've been moving away from these protagonist tags when the gendered tags are available... But this seems to be a hard case because the face is on full display and there's no defined difference between the male and female version, so I guess this one is fine.

1 25 26 27 28 29 30 31