Posted under Tags
Even if it made sense as a utility alias (it doesn't), halo removed isn't even for anything fallen angel-adjacent.
BUR #56143 has been rejected.
create alias halo_removed -> unworn_halo
ANON_TOKYO said in forum #423300:
Even if it made sense as a utility alias (it doesn't), halo removed isn't even for anything fallen angel-adjacent.
well halo removed makes no sense either. all our "removed" tags were aliased to "unworn". imo "fallen" makes sense because if the halo falls it's fallen. btw i just noticed we do have a unworn halo tag now so i guess we need either this or the opposite alias.
This is kinda a weird situation, as while haloes not floating above people's heads should be a tag, names like unworn halo sound weird because halos are not pieces of clothing.
It would most likely fall under the branch of "detached" tags like detached horns for example...or it would if halos weren't already detached by nature.
Maybe disembodied halo for the concept instead?
てはいさ said in forum #423315:
Are halos clothes?
i don't know i've never seen an angel in real life before. could be clothes. could be a body part. the important thing is that some poeple have tagged it unworn halo instead of halo removed so it would be better if there was an alias one way or the other
BUR #56268 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias unworn_halo -> halo_removed
I'll do this because someone might try to search for it and be tricked by the rest of our unworn tags, but the current tag name is fine. Halos are not worn.
The bulk update request #56268 (forum #423664) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #56143 (forum #423303) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #56140 (forum #423296) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
