Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Posted under General

Cudcuds said in forum #421565:
[...]

I'm going to disregard the conspiracy theory and critique the things you posted.

I rarely check rating:e posts in here but figured I would this time because of my Touhou bias but the nsfw Junko variants make the image much worse imo. Of course I'm going to be bias given my dislike for this stuff but it really doesn't look great. Tbh I don't like the sfw version much either.

For the andaerz stuff, refer to WRS's reply above as they beat me to explaining the same position I have. I disagree with WRS on the bad anatomy aspect, I just don't think it's as good as their other art.

The chest is bad, there is a 90 degree angle bend on the spine, the proportions are bad, and the left hand scares me. The right leg is also just a massive blotch of grey. I know you tend to disagree with most people on aspects about anatomy but that doesn't make it any less bad. There are far better examples of good anatomy even with the style.

Resourceful said in forum #421468:

I appealed it for you, its the same exact quality as post #10828269 and matches the anime style the site loves.

Thank you :)

It seems to me that there are 3-4 specific approvers who like Lori Hagami's art, and the rest appear to hate it ("disinterest").

I mean, seriously, what's wrong with post #10898586 ? I have to agree Cudcuds - there IS some sort of bias (towards particular uploaders) going on here.

I also think that maybe we need more approvers ?
Last night I posted post #10917877 and post #10917958,as well as post #10916433 earlier that day,and so far they are still pending approvals. While I know the thread is mostly for deleted posts. I also think that post #10917877 and post #10916433 both came from artists that got are frequently uploaded and approved . I do hope these two arts could be approved. In addition,if I were to “ask” some approvers to review and approve some of my pending posts. What thread should I go ?

So this first post hasn’t been deleted yet but it’s up to 3 days, I wanted to see what was wrong with it and avoid uploading anything with the same flaw in the future

SENSITIVE / QUESTIONABLE post #10904236

The following are actually deleted, for this one in particular I think it has a really nice art style but the stomach for Teto was an odd choice, it’s also my guess for why it got deleted

post #10571141

With this one I think it’s because of the colors, but I would also like someone else’s opinion of why it didn’t pass through

post #10605274

And finally this one I liked the pose and face a lot so I especially want to know for this one, my current guess was the reference image and “rgkg” style to it

EXPLICIT post #10848091

Updated by Snoozing

Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #421604:

I also think that maybe we need more approvers ?
Last night I posted post #10917877 and post #10917958,as well as post #10916433 earlier that day,and so far they are still pending approvals. While I know the thread is mostly for deleted posts. I also think that post #10917877 and post #10916433 both came from artists that got are frequently uploaded and approved . I do hope these two arts could be approved. In addition,if I were to “ask” some approvers to review and approve some of my pending posts. What thread should I go ?

Also, since we're already on this topic a lot of my uploads have been stalled recently too
Some were risky, I knew they had a flaw or two with them, but the other half are from proven artists always accepted artists
I just assumed it was a busy day or something

NervousG33k said in forum #421666:

No one ever responds here but it's all we got.

What's wrong here?

post #10906157
post #10906163

Two variants to something that is already active here. So whatever reason you have should apply to those, delete them too then.

Well, that is the typical example for the difference between the "good stuff" that is approved automatically and the "terrible stuff" that needs approval...

Arguments against deletion of the "good stuff":
- Good stuff
- Not against the rules
- No interest

Arguments against approval of the "terrible stuff":
- Bad anatomy
- Exaggerated proportions
- No interest (don't ask for the reason!)

Hello, I'm just wondering, is there any prohibition against AI generated content? I have been working on a serie of pictures about most hated anime female characters getting punished, and i wanted to upload some of them. Here is the first post

EXPLICIT post #10926520

Thanks for your time :)

WRS said in forum #421597:

The chest is bad, there is a 90 degree angle bend on the spine, the proportions are bad, and the left hand scares me. The right leg is also just a massive blotch of grey. I know you tend to disagree with most people on aspects about anatomy but that doesn't make it any less bad. There are far better examples of good anatomy even with the style.

I could let things like the 90 degree spine and the hips slide with the style, but it was more things like the chest and hands being obviously bad that made me not like it. My stance on anatomy for more regular styles is usually to do with things being possible for even just a slightly flexible person, or to do with how much it actually affects the overall image. For the example you responded with, I think there's a chance I'd approve if it was drawn better overall but will never know because it's not.

Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #421604:

I also think that maybe we need more approvers ?
Last night I posted post #10917877 and post #10917958,as well as post #10916433 earlier that day,and so far they are still pending approvals. While I know the thread is mostly for deleted posts. I also think that post #10917877 and post #10916433 both came from artists that got are frequently uploaded and approved . I do hope these two arts could be approved. In addition,if I were to “ask” some approvers to review and approve some of my pending posts. What thread should I go ?

I personally think approvals are in a good place right now. A batch of new approvers I don't feel would do anything but it's not my call.

This is the thread to go to but you're meant to wait until they're actually status:deleted and not pending still. I don't like post #10916433 for the arms, but it's also not really a style I like either.

Snoozing said in forum #421605:

So this first post hasn’t been deleted yet but it’s up to 3 days, I wanted to see what was wrong with it and avoid uploading anything with the same flaw in the future

SENSITIVE / QUESTIONABLE post #10904236

The following are actually deleted, for this one in particular I think it has a really nice art style but the stomach for Teto was an odd choice, it’s also my guess for why it got deleted

post #10571141

With this one I think it’s because of the colors, but I would also like someone else’s opinion of why it didn’t pass through

post #10605274

And finally this one I liked the pose and face a lot so I especially want to know for this one, my current guess was the reference image and “rgkg” style to it

EXPLICIT post #10848091

For post #10904236 I think their heads look too small, especially Kronii's. Her ass also kinda looks weird.

For post #10571141 it's the hands, specifically the fingers. The way they go around her cheeks/chin look a little weird. Maybe another approver might not think that's enough to disqualify it from approval upon appeal but I wouldn't bank on it.

adler_kr said in forum #421611:

post #10910468 - this is the best quality scan of this cover I've seen so far, it has more resolution than this version (post #904994), and it still looks like it's not going to be approved, I want to know why

You can see some crease lines from the scan.

adler_kr said in forum #421612:

post #10914783 post #10914847 post #10914925 post #10914972
these posts also looks like they're not going to be approved even though there is a couple of active posts with the art from the same artist with the same quality:

post #4060670 post #5883035 post #5883026 post #5883072

I don't think post #10914972 is as good as the one's that now have been approved.

dividebyzero said in forum #421657:

All those pictures adhere to the danbooru standards of quality. I do not see why no one is bothering to approve those pictures.
[...]

I think most of these sit on fringe, but fringe in the sense that I don't think they'd be approved, at least not by me. This includes your second message below too.

OzramLK said in forum #421682:

Hello, I'm just wondering, is there any prohibition against AI generated content? I have been working on a serie of pictures about most hated anime female characters getting punished, and i wanted to upload some of them. Here is the first post

EXPLICIT post #10926520

Thanks for your time :)

As stated in help:upload rules, fully ai-generated content is not allowed on Danbooru. Ai-assisted uploads are typically frowned upon and would need to have a sufficient amount of human input before being considered. There are some image boards that accept ai-gen content but I advise reading their upload rules and policies first before you think about uploading to them.

NiceLittleDan said in forum #421684:

As stated in help:upload rules, fully ai-generated content is not allowed on Danbooru. Ai-assisted uploads are typically frowned upon and would need to have a sufficient amount of human input before being considered. There are some image boards that accept ai-gen content but I advise reading their upload rules and policies first before you think about uploading to them.

Thanks, I guess this ones have not enough "human input". I combined some reference pictures with a complex prompt, but tbh the result is fully ai-generated. Thanks for the info, and your time explaining it. I read the rules, but wanted a deeper explanation :)