Posted under Tags
BUR #55680 has been rejected.
create implication boyfriend_(friday_night_funkin')_(d-sides) -> boyfriend_(friday_night_funkin')
create implication girlfriend_(friday_night_funkin')_(d-sides) -> girlfriend_(friday_night_funkin')
Noticed that the D-sides versions of GF and BF weren't implied to their OG selves (they are kinda like pallet swaps/costumes of them so I don't see why they shouldn't be implied to their original selves)
Updated by TheGamingRodent
Do we even need these tags? We have a Friday Night Funkin' (D-Sides) copytag, so you could just do boyfriend_(friday_night_funkin') friday_night_funkin'_(d-sides) or similar as a search for the designs.
Damian0358 said in forum #421460:
Do we even need these tags? We have a Friday Night Funkin' (D-Sides) copytag, so you could just do boyfriend_(friday_night_funkin') friday_night_funkin'_(d-sides) or similar as a search for the designs.
I guess I can do it that way, I'll make a new bur to nuke them
BUR #55683 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
nuke boyfriend_(friday_night_funkin')_(d-sides)
nuke girlfriend_(friday_night_funkin')_(d-sides)
per previous topic that Damian mentioned, cuz now that I think about it, we really don't need these days if we got the FNF D-Sides tag
The bulk update request #55680 (forum #421456) has been rejected by @TheGamingRodent.
BUR #55685 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication friday_night_funkin'_(d-sides) -> friday_night_funkin'
create implication friday_night_funkin'_mario's_madness -> friday_night_funkin'
create implication friday_night_funkin'_vs_dave_and_bambi -> friday_night_funkin'
Adding implications to some FNF mods
TheGamingRodent said in forum #421467:
BUR #55685 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication friday_night_funkin'_(d-sides) -> friday_night_funkin'
create implication friday_night_funkin'_mario's_madness -> friday_night_funkin'
create implication friday_night_funkin'_vs_dave_and_bambi -> friday_night_funkin'Adding implications to some FNF mods
I fixed the Friday Night Funkin' Vs Dave And Bambi tag to have a ' in it, so be sure to reedit the BUR to include the '
BUR #55892 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication mid-fight_masses -> friday_night_funkin'
Adding implications for the Mid-Fight Masses mod for FNF.
If we have a Mid-Fight Masses tag now, shouldn't we update Sarvente and co.'s qualifiers to have that in as their qualifier instead? As far as I know, the only reason why they have their current qualifier is because we didn't have mod copytags yet.
Damian0358 said in forum #422158:
If we have a Mid-Fight Masses tag now, shouldn't we update Sarvente and co.'s qualifiers to have that in as their qualifier instead? As far as I know, the only reason why they have their current qualifier is because we didn't have mod copytags yet.
I think someone is doing it already? But I do agree they should be updated
The bulk update request #55685 (forum #421467) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #55892 (forum #422155) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #55683 (forum #421462) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #56045 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias sarvente_(friday_night_funkin') -> sarvente_(mid-fight_masses)
create alias ruvyzvat_(friday_night_funkin') -> ruvyzvat_(mid-fight_masses)
create alias selever_(friday_night_funkin') -> selever_(mid-fight_masses)
create alias rasazy_(friday_night_funkin') -> rasazy_(mid-fight_masses)
Needs new qualifier for copyright
BUR #56070 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication vs_rewrite -> friday_night_funkin'
Missing mod implication for Friday Night Funkin'
BUR #56097 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication friday_night_funkin'_online_vs. -> friday_night_funkin'
Here's this one too.
TheGamingRodent said in forum #423087:
BUR #56070 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication vs_rewrite -> friday_night_funkin'
Missing mod implication for Friday Night Funkin'
This sounds like a crossover mod, it'd be a bad idea to imply it to a specific copyright.
Confetto said in forum #423164:
BUR #56097 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication friday_night_funkin'_online_vs. -> friday_night_funkin'
Here's this one too.
Same for this, if they feature other copyrights I'm not sure it's a good idea. post #10603140 is a character from another copyright.
nonamethanks said in forum #423708:
Same for this, if they feature other copyrights I'm not sure it's a good idea. post #10603140 is a character from another copyright.
I mean, it does, but it's still 100% a reference to FNF specifically through the mod. I think it's fair, especially in Online VS.'s case where the other copyrights featured are Newgrounds cameos, something the original game has already.
It'd be pretty hard to make an image that would be tagged with the mod that wouldn't also be FNF-related, given it's an FNF mod. It's not like you could just draw a regular picture of a character from the crossover copyright and then tag it with the mod, unless it's like a sprite redraw which is still a direct game reference.
And in FNF Online VS.'s case, it's still primarily about FNF, it's not really a crossover. It just has cameos like the base game already does, but new ones. Not sure about Rewrite, but I think that version of Sonic.EXE is also specific to that mod in the first place? Like it's a variation of the character created for the mod.
nonamethanks said in forum #423707:
This sounds like a crossover mod, it'd be a bad idea to imply it to a specific copyright.
Mario's Madness was also a crossover mod, so idk why it wouldn't be implied to as it's part of the game as a mod, VS Rewrite is based on the Sonic.EXE character Rewrite.
