shotadom/lolidom

BUR #54531 has been rejected.

create implication shotadom -> shota
create implication lolidom -> loli

Hello it's me again (what)

So, I think shota/loli is(are) required to perform a shotadom/lolidom.

AnyFintinum said in forum #417336:

BUR #54531 has been rejected.

create implication shotadom -> shota
create implication lolidom -> loli

Hello it's me again (what)

So, I think shota/loli is(are) required to perform a shotadom/lolidom.

Are these mistags? post #8327574 post #8427335 post #4125406?

There's quite a few under lolidom -loli which feature younger girls but don't fall under loli.

zetsubousensei said in forum #417340:

Are these mistags? post #8327574 post #8427335 post #4125406?

There's quite a few under lolidom -loli which feature younger girls but don't fall under loli.

Just according to wiki's definition

"A sexual situation in which the dominant partner is the loli. The masculine equivalent would be shotadom."

Those 3 posts may be tagged with age_difference I think.

I think this makes sense. The fact the tag isn't used perfectly isn't a reason it shouldn't be an implication. But it needs cleaning first.

It's not like kodomo doushi or onee loli / shota where it doesn't necessarily have to be loli or shota. This is a clear case where it should be a shota or loli in a dominant role.

Freshblink said in forum #417344:

I think this makes sense. The fact the tag isn't used perfectly isn't a reason it shouldn't be an implication. But it needs cleaning first.

It's not like kodomo doushi or onee loli / shota where it doesn't necessarily have to be loli or shota. This is a clear case where it should be a shota or loli in a dominant role.

Gotta clean it today.

What about oppai lolis who are often not tagged loli on account of their big titties but would count as loli for the purpose of this?

AnyFintinum said in forum #417341:

Just according to wiki's definition

Those 3 posts may be tagged with age_difference I think.

age difference doesn't specify that the younger partner has to be the dominant one like lolidom/shotadom do.

post #8427335 and post #8327574 look like they would count as lolidom/onee-loli to me, but now that you've removed those tags from them what alternate way is there to search for posts like that? The majority of age difference posts have the older party being dominant, making it difficult to find the exceptions like those.

Either they should always count as loli or shota, or they should be called something else. There are too many people using these and other tags like this (e.g. onee-loli, onee-shota, onii-shota) as an excuse to dodge restrictions and not properly tag their posts.

BUR #54599 has been rejected.

remove implication lolidom -> femdom
create alias lolidom -> smalldom
create alias shotadom -> smalldom

evazion said in forum #417570:

...or they should be called something else...

I think NNT's proposal in forum #305522 makes sense. You can still search for specifically loli/shotadom with just a two tag search and the tag name isn't misleading. It also makes the tag a bit more flexible in usage.

I don’t think most people looking for specifically lolidom or shotadom would like the other one in their searches. I’m not entirely against making a blanket smalldom tag that both imply (seems helpful for blacklists and the minority that may want to see both) but I think it’s useful to keep them separate

smalldom sounds like some kind of height difference / size difference situation.

evazion said in forum #417570:

Either they should always count as loli or shota, or they should be called something else. There are too many people using these and other tags like this (e.g. onee-loli, onee-shota, onii-shota) as an excuse to dodge restrictions and not properly tag their posts.

i was told if it's onee-shota but only the onee is "sexualized" then it doesn't count as shota, like post #10690523

instead of smalldom imo younger dom is better, but the problem is that is probably going to be a lot of mature_male femdom posts. also smalldom technically includes goblins right?

also what about assertive female? no assertive loli?

wingdings said in forum #417649:

smalldom sounds like some kind of height difference / size difference situation.

Those tags are so broad that they're pretty much useless to find specific things like these.

The bulk update request #54599 (forum #417628) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

BUR #55969 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication shotadom -> smalldom
create implication lolidom -> smalldom

I'll do this though. exhentai uses this tag. It's also a tag that would help narrowing down size difference/height difference.

trapster77 said in forum #417655:

instead of smalldom imo younger dom is better

Terrible idea as usual. goblins aren't young characters.

The bulk update request #55969 (forum #422649) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #56017 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

remove implication shotadom -> smalldom
remove implication lolidom -> smalldom

The wiki for the new smalldom tag defines it as:

A smaller character dominating a larger one.

(Which is basically the same as ExHentai's definition.)

The issue is several posts in lolidom/shotadom don't meet this definition, e.g. smalldom kodomo_doushi (lolis and shotas are both equally small so there's no "larger one" there) or smalldom solo (lolis dominating the unseen PoV character, so it's unclear which is smaller) or smalldom mini_person (dom is small, sub is even smaller than that).

We can either remove the implications so that those sorts of posts being tagged lolidom/shotadom won't always add smalldom automatically, or we expand the wiki definition of smalldom to "a small character dominating anyone, regardless of the sub's size". Which is preferable here?

I'll remove the implication and garden out the wrong content, it's easier that way.

The bulk update request #56017 (forum #422904) has been approved by @nonamethanks.