FGO requests

BUR #51712 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication lord_logres_(fate) -> artoria_pendragon_(fate)

ah fuck not again

The bulk update request #51712 (forum #402700) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

So like, do we care about the difference between Solomon (Caster) and Solomon (Pretender) compared to Solomon and Grand Caster? Because like there are differences (pretender has only one ring, caster has ten; pretender has facial lines (like grand caster), caster doesn't) but I'm not sure if they're significant enough to bother.

Ylimegirl said:

So like, do we care about the difference between Solomon (Caster) and Solomon (Pretender) compared to Solomon and Grand Caster? Because like there are differences (pretender has only one ring, caster has ten; pretender has facial lines (like grand caster), caster doesn't) but I'm not sure if they're significant enough to bother.

I mean they are different characters.

BUR #52793 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication lord_logres_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> lord_logres_(fate)
create implication lord_logres_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> lord_logres_(fate)
create implication lord_logres_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> lord_logres_(fate)

Implications for Lord Logres
Happy New year

The bulk update request #52793 (forum #411150) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #53476 has been approved by @evazion.

Not sure why we don't have the dash in her name?

BUR #53514 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication fuuma_kotarou_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> fuuma_kotarou_(fate)
create implication fuuma_kotarou_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> fuuma_kotarou_(fate)

Fuuma's first 2 ascensions have tags and aren't implied.

BUR #53552 has been approved by @evazion.

create alias romulus_quirinus_(fate) -> romulus-quirinus_(fate)
create alias romulus_quirinus_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> romulus-quirinus_(second_ascension)_(fate)
create alias romulus_quirinus_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> romulus-quirinus_(third_ascension)_(fate)
create alias romulus_quirinus_(supreme_place_of_learning)_(fate) -> romulus-quirinus_(supreme_place_of_learning)_(fate)

Also not sure why we don't have a dash for him either.

The bulk update request #53476 (forum #413657) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #53514 (forum #413817) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #53552 (forum #413938) has been approved by @evazion.

BUR #53698 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication okita_souji_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> okita_souji_(koha-ace)
create implication okita_souji_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> okita_souji_(koha-ace)
create implication okita_souji_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> okita_souji_(koha-ace)
create implication okita_souji_(teal_haori_and_hakama)_(fate) -> okita_souji_(koha-ace)

Implications for Vanilla okita
Don't know why this never happened for her

The bulk update request #53698 (forum #414416) has been approved by @evazion.

Crossland said in forum #414416:

BUR #53698 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication okita_souji_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> okita_souji_(koha-ace)
create implication okita_souji_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> okita_souji_(koha-ace)
create implication okita_souji_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> okita_souji_(koha-ace)
create implication okita_souji_(teal_haori_and_hakama)_(fate) -> okita_souji_(koha-ace)

Implications for Vanilla okita
Don't know why this never happened for her

Because topic #33158 never got resolved and now there's even more to redetangle if it does.

Ylimegirl said in forum #414567:

Because topic #33158 never got resolved and now there's even more to redetangle if it does.

Why? Isn't the "okita_souji_(fate)" tag serving the same purpose as the "artoria_pendragon_(fate)" tag? All the other Okita ascensions got their implications expect for the original. I don't see the problem tbh.

Crossland said in forum #414646:

Why? Isn't the "okita_souji_(fate)" tag serving the same purpose as the "artoria_pendragon_(fate)" tag? All the other Okita ascensions got their implications expect for the original. I don't see the problem tbh.

Okita doesn't have nearly as many variants as Saber. Okita Souji (Koha-Ace) is almost identical to Okita Souji (Fate) at this point, especially since she doesn't really have an "original outfit" from Koha-Ace—she appears in what equates to all three of her FGO ascensions iirc, whereas Nobbu is pretty much exclusively her uniform or nekkid (which is exclusively what the koha-ace tag is for; no subrellas there!). Is the argument "koha-ace for non-alter"? Because that's also achievable by okita_souji_(fate) -okita_souji_alter_(fate). Now that all her costumes are implied there, it's certainly not for her "default" appearance, whatever that can be argued to be at this point.

Yeah, the distinction between Okita Souji (Fate) and Okita Souji (Koha-Ace) is something I don't really understand.

Just make Okita Souji (Koha-Ace) to Okita Souji (Fate) since there's no difference between the 2.
Separate Okita Souji Alter (Fate) from Okita Souji (Fate) since she's her own person like you did with Jeanne D'arc Alter (Fate)
Problem solved.

BUR #53774 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication emiya_shirou_(the_one_who_withstood_pain) -> emiya_shirou

This wasn't tagged so here