post #9890733 ? (tagged as sensitive)
Posted under General
post #9890733 ? (tagged as sensitive)
denliner27 said:
post #9890733 ? (tagged as sensitive)
not loli
post #10573062 is not loli, but I'm basically trying to do a petite check instead, is that figure the kind of thing that the tag would apply to? Seems short, but clearly has small breasts and curves, whatnot...
Kinda hijacking for a bit
Searchwanted said:
post #10573062 is not loli, but I'm basically trying to do a petite check instead, is that figure the kind of thing that the tag would apply to? Seems short, but clearly has small breasts and curves, whatnot...
Kinda hijacking for a bit
I would suggest putting questions about petite tags in topic #12251 if they don’t involve the loli tag.
This character is inconsistently tagged:
post #5213401
post #6084065
post #6757646
post #8140321
post #8593621
post #8661008
post #5445848
post #6756380
post #7144396
The majority of posts don't have the shota tag, so which is correct in this case?
The lore of the character is that they drank a shrinking potion which is why he is smaller than her sometimes.
Updated by Xirtr
Xirtr said:
The majority of posts don't have the shota tag, which is correct in this case.
The lore of the character is that they drank a shrinking potion which is why he is smaller than her sometimes.
The lore is irrelevant to whether a post is eligible for loli or shota. If the character looks like a child and is being portrayed in a sexually suggestive or explicit manner, then it should be tagged with one of these. And this is determined on a case-by-case basis.
You can see this with Blue Archive characters like Hoshino and Hina. Sometimes, they're drawn to look like teens with small body types (petite). Other times, they're drawn to look like kids (loli).
Blank_User said:
The lore is irrelevant to whether a post is eligible for loli or shota. If the character looks like a child and is being portrayed in a sexually suggestive or explicit manner, then it should be tagged with one of these. And this is determined on a case-by-case basis.
You can see this with Blue Archive characters like Hoshino and Hina. Sometimes, they're drawn to look like teens with small body types (petite). Other times, they're drawn to look like actual kids (loli).
I would argue that dyrhart is depicted in the same manner in all those posts. So therefore, should all of them have the tag?
post #5474440
Tag was present before and removed, but I feel it's still appropriate here
Alternatively post #10537072 seems too mature to be loli
should loli be added to post #677492 ?
post #10595841 and siblings
WRS said:
post #10595841 and siblings
I would say yes personally
aster1a said:
yeah, seems like it
obliterator said:
should loli be added to post #677492 ?
nah
post #10614401
onee-shota, unsure if it's suggestive enough for the shota tag.
post #10619479 and children
Placeholder1996 said:
post #10619479 and children
No. Looks teenage.