BUR #51621 has been approved by @evazion.
mass update favgroup:49637 -> cutie_(umamusume)
Okay, this sounds insane, but please hear me out.
"KS, isn't that just umamusume character_doll, or better yet, '[character_name] character_doll'?" Why yes, yes it is. However, what this search doesn't filter out that a tag would includes but isn't limited to:
- posts where the doll has a noticeably different design from a normal cutie doll in the franchise (post #10352743, post #10320748), not to be confused with things like post #9961596 where the doll is merely "chibified" in proportion to the artist's style, as seen with Narita Top Road here.
- posts where the doll in question is actually a keychain, usually on a bag (post #10162523), which the status of as a cutie is rather questionable.
- posts that just have a photo of an actual Umamusume plush photoshopped into the artwork (post #10227986, post #10184195).
- posts where the doll in question is not actually a cutie and is in fact a plushie of something completely different, resulting in a guaranteed false positive. (post #9974538)
These are all posts I could find not being a cutie within the first five pages of the umamusume character_doll search...out of 70. Yeah, that's a lot of posts, many of which may not even be what people searching for them may want. This tag aims to combat this by being a tag for a specific design of character doll, as seen in in-universe UFO catchers you can win them out of in-game, based on the many horse girls.
My favgroup is meant to give an idea of what that tag should ideally encompass (so that we don't tag every character doll in Umamusume as a cutie), but whether or not this is a good idea or KS has stayed up too late? Up to you guys. Just my thoughts on the situation and curious to see how this would go.