Posted under Tags
BUR #49128 has been rejected.
create implication undone_bra -> open_bra
undone_bra is defined in the wiki as "A bra that has been unfastened but is still hanging around the wearer's body."
open_bra is defined in the wiki as "A bra that has been opened/unfastened from the front or the back, usually via a clasp, clip or tie between the cups."
Since undone_bra definition says the bra is unfastened, it also satisfies the requirement for open_bra
Related: topic #19725
If we don't care about the additional detail that "still hanging around the wearer's body"
we can alias the tags as mentioned in topic #19725. I think all of these tags (open_bra, undone_bra, unhooked_bra) can be aliased to unfastened_bra.
I think unfastened_bra is the best description of what the tag open_bra is being used for currently.
implacable said:
BUR #49128 has been rejected.
create implication undone_bra -> open_bra
undone_bra is defined in the wiki as "A bra that has been unfastened but is still hanging around the wearer's body."
open_bra is defined in the wiki as "A bra that has been opened/unfastened from the front or the back, usually via a clasp, clip or tie between the cups."
Since undone_bra definition says the bra is unfastened, it also satisfies the requirement for open_bra
i think open bra is for open at the front like open shirt and open jacket while undone bra is for open at the back which is why it hangs, so the tags are unrelated
trapster77 said:
i think open bra is for open at the front like open shirt and open jacket while undone bra is for open at the back which is why it hangs, so the tags are unrelated
I think this was how it was intended to be used initially, but due to misuse it is now considered an alias for unhooked_bra & untied_bra (See linked topic & aliases of open_bra). Cleaning this up will require a huge effort & that's probably the reason why it was aliased this way instead.
BUR #49229 has been rejected.
create alias undone_bra -> open_bra_(at_back)
create implication open_bra_(at_back) -> open_bra
mass update 1girl open_bra (front-hook_bra OR front-tie_bra) -> open_bra_(at_front) -open_bra_(at_back)
mass update 1girl open_bra -front-hook_bra -front-tie_bra -> open_bra_(at_back)
create implication open_bra_(at_front) -> open_bra
implacable said:
I think this was how it was intended to be used initially, but due to misuse it is now considered an alias for unhooked_bra & untied_bra (See linked topic & aliases of open_bra). Cleaning this up will require a huge effort & that's probably the reason why it was aliased this way instead.
imo it's not that much effort if it's only 3k posts. people have tagged 3k posts before (that's why we're here), they'll probably tag it right eventually if they can tell what the right tag is supposed to be
what if we split the tag into at_front and at_back?
BUR #49230 has been rejected.
create alias undone_bra -> open_bra_(at_back)
create implication open_bra_(at_back) -> open_bra
mass update 1girl open_bra (front-hook_bra OR front-tie_bra) -> -open_bra_(at_back)
alternative separating only open_bra_(at_back)
Also is this conjugation needed ?
would having just the following two separate tags satisfy all the cases ?
front_bra open_bra
Then we can
imply front-hook_bra -> front_bra
imply front-tie_bra -> front_bra
We can add a back_bra tag as well if it would be useful.
If someone wants to look for bra open from the front they, can search for front_bra open_bra
& for open at back -front_bra open_bra
I understand this might cause issues when there are >=2 girls & they have mixed front & back bras where only one of them is opened.
not sure if we need that level of distinction
The bulk update request #49128 (forum #392599) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #49229 (forum #392925) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #49230 (forum #392927) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
