The bulk update request #49876 (forum #395470) has been approved by @evazion.
Posted under Tags
The bulk update request #49876 (forum #395470) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #49879 (forum #395478) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #49882 (forum #395489) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #49883 (forum #395490) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #49917 (forum #395603) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #49918 (forum #395605) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #49916 (forum #395600) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #50210 has been rejected.
create alias chen_tianwu -> owl_(honkai_impact)
Real name to codename, like Natasha Cioara to Raven and Bianka Durandal Ataegina to Durandal. This name is used albeit in lesser capacity to his codename.
The bulk update request #50210 (forum #396731) has been rejected by @WRS.
BUR #50233 has been rejected.
remove implication fu_hua_(seagull's_soar) -> fu_hua
create implication fu_hua_(seagull's_soar) -> fu_hua_(shadow_knight)
Why is this not tagged under Fu Hua Shadow Knight?
See forum #395600. I've begun moving to have some costumes imply the base character tag (like what is done for Part 2 characters) instead of splitting them up by the playable versions because for Danbooru purposes (and even arguably in the game itself), both base playable versions and costumes are altogether "just" costumes. Nothing ties these costumes to the tags they were originally implied to besides what the game says.
The bulk update request #50233 (forum #396807) has been rejected by @Sigewulf.
WRS said:
See forum #395600. I've begun moving to have some costumes imply the base character tag (like what is done for Part 2 characters) instead of splitting them up by the playable versions because for Danbooru purposes (and even arguably in the game itself), both base playable versions and costumes are altogether "just" costumes. Nothing ties these costumes to the tags they were originally implied to besides what the game says.
Huh, I didn't notice that.
BUR #50343 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication rita_rossweisse_(elegant_spy) -> rita_rossweisse
New costume, tentative naming from a rough translation. I expect a localisation update in a few weeks.
BUR #51453 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
rename rita_rossweisse_(elegant_spy) -> rita_rossweisse_(miss_espionage)
Official English name is released, to accompany the acceptance of the above BUR. I'll go with a rename since it's still a fresh tag and the old name won't be very useful to keep even as an alias.
With NNT back, I just want to make a note about a response in the Honkai: Star Rail implications topic in advance in case a backread is done and questions are asked about flattening implications for Honkai Impact 3rd characters (forum #402492).
For all intents and purposes, I want to reiterate that moving some characters to two levels of implications is because they are the exact same character through every variant and costume, so it just makes sense for them to be this way, whether for story or otherwise. I don't find that most of the way the tags were separated before were justified, so those were the ones I got out of the way where they won't adversely affect searching and will clean up the way the tags are used.
I have not and do not intend to submit any two-level implication reductions for alternate forms right now because that will pollute and muddy the ability to find them (e.g. I didn't submit them for all Theresa Apocalypse tags and have not yet made any moves for the last few characters, and Griseo's won't change). This way, characters that have variants can have that variant and the costumes for it scoped to an intermediate tag, while characters without actual variants can have them all seen as costumes of the one person.
ETA: The only thing is I might have to revisit Fallen Rosemary (tricky because of a shared outfit) and Fu Hua (Fenghuang of Vicissitude). Everything else should be correct.
Updated by WRS
The bulk update request #49954 (forum #395737) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #49956 (forum #395745) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #49957 (forum #395746) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
