BUR #46311 has been rejected.
create implication yoga_pants -> leggings
Comparing the posts on Pixiv tagged with レギンス (leggings), ヨガウェア (yogawear), and ヨガパンツ (yoga pants), it seems that yoga pants is considered a kind of leggings.
Posted under Tags
BUR #46311 has been rejected.
create implication yoga_pants -> leggings
Comparing the posts on Pixiv tagged with レギンス (leggings), ヨガウェア (yogawear), and ヨガパンツ (yoga pants), it seems that yoga pants is considered a kind of leggings.
BUR #46321 has been rejected.
remove implication yoga_pants -> pants
create alias yoga_pants -> leggings
As Marq said, "yoga pants" are just another name for leggings; if you google them both, you get pretty much the same results. As such, I'd prefer to see yoga_pants aliased to leggings rather than imply it. However, they are at the very least definitely not pants, so that implication needs to be removed regardless of what happens. I'll be submitting a second BUR for that in the case OP's BUR is approved instead.
BUR #46322 has been rejected.
remove implication yoga_pants -> pants
As above. Approve this if OP's BUR gets approved.
AngryZapdos said:
BUR #46321 has been rejected.
remove implication yoga_pants -> pants
create alias yoga_pants -> leggingsAs Marq said, "yoga pants" are just another name for leggings
I didn't say that. I said that it's rather common for people to do that, with the alternative of considering yoga pants as a variant of leggings being also common.
The bulk update request #46311 (forum #379368) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #46321 (forum #379389) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #46322 (forum #379390) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
LightSolas said in forum #414333:
What do you mean yoga pants aren't pants? Why wouldn't they be?
Because they're just another name for leggings, which we don't tag as pants.
