I have animal sexualization and NSFW chibikemo and furrychibi blacklisted which helps, but I guess Isabelle isn't any kind of chibi? The first post isn't even tagged furry. It is pokephilia, but Hypno and Houndoom aren't the problem, and Pokemon might be the main perpetrator but it's not the only one.
I don't want to be blacklisting realistic proportioned stuff, or even chibi sex, the problem is chibi-proportioned characters with realistic sex organs.
Is there a tag I'm not noticing or one I should be adding? Or is there just no way to block this type of content on Danbooru without taking out swathes of other stuff?
It's a stopgap measure until more discussion is had, but you could blacklist the artist tags that draw this style content for now. Or the artist tag is:nsfw if you want to see their SFW posts.
If you have a relatively manageable list of Pokemons whose porn you're interested in, and don't see yourself searching for NSFW posts of other pokemons very often, maybe try a "whitelist" with this query:
If you have a relatively manageable list of Pokemons whose porn you're interested in, and don't see yourself searching for NSFW posts of other pokemons very often, maybe try a "whitelist" with this query:
The disadvantage is this would blacklist posts that are human-focus but happen to feature Pokemons, such as post #9981691 (Q).
I would recommend switching pokemon_(creature) to pokephilia so it only filters out posts with a pokemon being sexualized though that does mean any post where there's a whitelist pokemon AND a non-whitelist pokemon will still be visible.
I tried asking about something similar here forum #375980 because some of these posts with Jirachi and Celebi really look like toddlercon to me but they're not even getting tagged as loli.
Just to clarify, are you also trying to avoid stuff like post #9300175, post #8633106, and post #7047666? Or are you only trying to blacklist non-human characters?
The core thing that triggers me is sexual depictions of anything resembling a child. loli and shota happens to pick up most of the slack.
Separately, I don't like animal sexualization. But I can handle human-proportioned furries.
post #6013723 just looks like regular Bulbasaur at a glance. Giving the baby Pokemon a slightly more humanoid shape lets it evade animal sexualization but doesn't qualify it as loli??? (I also have petite blacklisted but that's rarely tagged)
AngryZapdos said:
Just to clarify, are you also trying to avoid stuff like post #9300175, post #8633106, and post #7047666? Or are you only trying to blacklist non-human characters?
All of those posts feature chibi-proportioned characters in a chibi style (low detail, simple shapes, flat colours, very 2D) with chibi faces and chibi vaginas. If the depiction of penetration/genitals looked like it did in any old rating:e image, then I'd be more likely to have a problem. If those posts featured Isabelle they would probably be fine.
It's probably confusing to use the word chibi. The typical Isabelle post isn't in a chibi style, it's in the standard anime style but Isabelle still has her usual in-game proportions. Isabelle with her big-head childish-face small-body proportions in a typical anime style resembles loli.
(edit: the question is if all the posts in my OP would have a loli/shota tag if the characters were human. if they would, then yes I'm just trying to blacklist non-human posts evading loli/shota)
With the creation of smalldom Danbooru finally has a tag that acknowledges "small" characters that don't fall under loli/shota.
Now if there were only a tag for small humanoid creatures in other situations. I referenced "cute" characters in this thread, but if there was a tag that also included halflings and goblins then I'd happily give them up as collateral to be able to blacklist everything else.
