imply above_cleavage_cutout -> clothing_cutout

BUR #44094 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication above_cleavage_cutout -> clothing_cutout

Cutout is cutout.

fuck, meant to upvote. Nevermind.

Am I overthinking it or should it be called an above-cleavage_cutout (cutout above the cleavage), not above_cleavage_cutout (something above a cleavage_cutout)

BUR #44129 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create alias above_cleavage_cutout -> above-cleavage_cutout

As @heartattack mentioned before (forum #371093), the current tag name implies something above the cleavage cutout, rather than a cutout above the cleavage.

BUR #44134 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication cutout_above_navel -> clothing_cutout
create implication cutout_below_navel -> clothing_cutout

Both are clothing cutout too.
(Or should imply to stomach cutout?)

BUR #44135 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication hip_vent -> clothing_cutout
create implication crotch_cutout -> clothing_cutout
create implication arm_cutout -> clothing_cutout
create implication glove_cutout -> clothing_cutout

More clothing cutouts.

BUR #44136 has been rejected.

create implication diamond_cutout -> clothing_cutout

I'm not too sure about this one but I'll leave it just in case.

The bulk update request #44094 (forum #371035) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #44129 (forum #371201) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #44135 (forum #371212) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

LuxuryRay said:

BUR #44136 has been rejected.

create implication diamond_cutout -> clothing_cutout

I'm not too sure about this one but I'll leave it just in case.

What about argyle cutout? Should they be merged?

The bulk update request #44134 (forum #371210) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #45576 has been approved by @evazion.

create alias argyle_cutout -> diamond_cutout

They're essentially the same, diamond-shaped but without the plaid pattern.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #44136 (forum #371213) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #45576 (forum #376418) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

LuxuryRay said:

BUR #45576 has been approved by @evazion.

create alias argyle_cutout -> diamond_cutout

They're essentially the same, diamond-shaped but without the plaid pattern.

Looks like a diamond cutout is a single diamond while an argyle cutout is for a series of diamonds. In any case argyle cutout is not the right word for it, that's like calling something a plaid cutout instead of a square cutout.

The bulk update request #45576 (forum #376418) has been approved by @evazion.