Posted under Tags
BUR #13314 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication animal_ear_headphones -> headphones
create implication animal_ear_headphones -> fake_animal_ears
Should be obvious, bunny headphones and cat ear headphones already imply it for comparison. The second part may be more controversial though.
Both bunny and cat tags should imply animal_ear_headphones instead of headphones.
Nameless_Contributor said:
Both bunny and cat tags should imply animal_ear_headphones instead of headphones.
bunny headphones was originally for the headphones in post #5651379, so unless we make bunny ear headphones it shouldn't.
There's a point to be made for animal headphones with headphones removed which would pull fake animal ears, which would pull animal ears, despite no character technically having animal ears in the picture, but it's really more of a technicality, and there's several posts under fake_animal_ears headband_removed anyway so it's not like it's a new "problem".
The bulk update request #13314 (forum #226286) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #13451 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
remove implication cat_ear_headphones -> headphones
create implication cat_ear_headphones -> animal_ear_headphones
The bunny one is currently used both for the nagato yuki ones and actual animal ear headphones like post #4753256, so a bunny ear headphones tag is not a bad idea.
Let's do the cat one first.
Updated by magcolo
The bulk update request #13451 (forum #226760) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
wait a minute, bunny ear headphones already exists! In this case…
BUR #13595 has been approved by @evazion.
create alias bunny_ear_headphones -> rabbit_ear_headphones
create implication rabbit_ear_headphones -> animal_ear_headphones
Consistency with rabbit ears. Should bunny headphones have a qualifier?
magcolo said:
Should bunny headphones have a qualifier?
The tag is not just for Nagato's earphones, there's also posts like post #5515682 which would still apply. It should probably be renamed to something else but not sure what.
The bulk update request #13595 (forum #227306) has been approved by @evazion.
Should animal ear headphones get the corresponding animal ear tag? ex. cat ear headphones with cat ears.
magcolo said:
Should animal ear headphones get the corresponding animal ear tag? ex. cat ear headphones with cat ears.
Yes. You can use mechanical ears as well where they look sufficiently mechanical.
BUR #42121 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication bear_ear_headphones -> animal_ear_headphones
create implication fox_ear_headphones -> animal_ear_headphones
More implications for animal ear headphones.
Updated by asgembed . js
The bulk update request #42121 (forum #359793) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #43242 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication cat_ear_headphones -> cat_ears
create implication rabbit_ear_headphones -> rabbit_ears
create implication fox_ear_headphones -> fox_ears
create implication bear_ear_headphones -> bear_ears
Considering cat ear hairband implicates cat ears and rabbit ear hairband implicates rabbit ears, let's do the same thing
to animal ear headphones.
The bulk update request #43242 (forum #364281) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
