Sideboob/underboob

Both these tags seem horribly misused to me, mainly in regards to both of them + cleavage being slapped on every bikini pic.
The wiki for sideboob even says "When >ONLY< the outer side(s) of the breasts are visible through a gap in the clothing." (the underboob wiki is lacking the "only" part however). There's also cases of sideboob being tagged on nude/topless pics where the subject is viewed from the side but at least that feels closer to what I'm looking for when I search for sideboob. Specifically, when I search for sideboob I'm expecting pics like post #9728290 not post #9725940 (????)

I started fixing a few blatantly mistagged ones (nipples visible, should have been backboob instead) but I don't want to be accused of vandalism for trying to remove it from all those swimsuit pics (not to mention the sheer number is more than I'd want to mess with anyway)

I agree with you, a lot of the breast related tags get overused by people that tag way too literally or way too broadly. Seeing sideboob and underboob together on micro bikinis is annoying.

I would say these tags shouldn't be used on most standard bikinis. The design of the swimsuit should emphasize it for it to count, rather than literally every bikini top being tagged sideboob when it's so common for them to not cover the whole breast anyway.

blindVigil said:

I would say these tags shouldn't be used on most standard bikinis. The design of the swimsuit should emphasize it for it to count, rather than literally every bikini top being tagged sideboob when it's so common for them to not cover the whole breast anyway.

I think that's reasonable for sideboob unless the bikini gives a lot of coverage besides that area, but standard bikinis are meant to cover the bottoms of the breasts, so I think underboob can still apply for a lot of them. Though things like post #9725940 probably shouldn't apply since it's pretty much just the nipples covered; no different than pasties connected by a string.