Oh thank goodness. I'll go ahead and do clean-up on my own ridiculously high post count. It's so nice to have actual tags for specific crossdressing now.
Posted under Tags
Oh thank goodness. I'll go ahead and do clean-up on my own ridiculously high post count. It's so nice to have actual tags for specific crossdressing now.
Ylimegirl said:
BUR #43530 is pending approval.
create implication female_butler -> crossdressing_(ftm)
Just this one by itself then.
I don't think post #8221461 would count as crossdressing.
Blank_User said:
I don't think post #8221461 would count as crossdressing.
And I don't think that should be tagged with female butler, but agree to disagree.
Ylimegirl said:
And I don't think that should be tagged with female butler, but agree to disagree.
I mean, it is intended to be a butler outfit (in-game, it's called アームドバトラー, or "Armed Butler") and I don't see anything in the image that contradicts that. Maybe we need a nontraditional butler tag?
BUR #43536 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
mass update crossdressing -solo -crossdressing_(mtf) -crossdressing_(ftm) (1girl or multiple_girls) -(1boy or multiple_boys) -(1other or multiple_others) -> crossdressing_(ftm)
mass update crossdressing -solo -crossdressing_(mtf) -crossdressing_(ftm) (1boy or multiple_boys) -(1girl or multiple_girls) -(1other or multiple_others) -> crossdressing_(mtf)
How about some more mass updates? The original BUR handled all solo posts, while this one should get all of the remaining single-sex posts (e.g. multiple views or multiple boys) which add up to about 13k more posts that can be automated. That would leave around 9k mixed-sex posts to do manually.
The bulk update request #43516 (forum #365551) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #43536 (forum #365702) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The problem with male maid and female butler implying crossdressing is that crossdressing is mutually exclusive with trap (and presumably reverse trap). About one-third of male maid posts are tagged trap and a few dozen female butler posts are tagged reverse trap.
Considering how often crossdressing gets tagged with trap and reverse trap, would it be easier just to change the definition to allow the tags to coexist on the same character?
agglego2 said:
The problem with male maid and female butler implying crossdressing is that crossdressing is mutually exclusive with trap (and presumably reverse trap). About one-third of male maid posts are tagged trap and a few dozen female butler posts are tagged reverse trap.
Considering how often crossdressing gets tagged with trap and reverse trap, would it be easier just to change the definition to allow the tags to coexist on the same character?
They're not mutually exclusive, though?
agglego2 said:
The problem with male maid and female butler implying crossdressing is that crossdressing is mutually exclusive with trap (and presumably reverse trap). About one-third of male maid posts are tagged trap and a few dozen female butler posts are tagged reverse trap.
Considering how often crossdressing gets tagged with trap and reverse trap, would it be easier just to change the definition to allow the tags to coexist on the same character?
since when have they been mutually exclusive??? most trap posts that ive seen (as well as a lot of reverse trap posts) are crossdressing to the point where some ppl consider them one and the same. they don't have to overlap (trap/reverse trap characters can wear clothes of their real gender and still look convincing, crossdressing characters can be very obviously their real gender) but they often do, that's how i read the wiki article