Fighting Stance Implications

BUR #40180 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication gatotsu_stance -> fighting_stance
create implication sword_guard_stance -> fighting_stance

They are subsets of fighting stance.

Didn't know we had gatotsu stance, so I used hand to blade for this action.
But it seems that hand to blade is more widely used.

finalwar said:

hand to blade is more widely used.

You are correct. While many of the posts under hand to blade can be tagged as fighting stance, some posts, such as post #7275277 and post #8845656, are not. I'll garden it later.

BUR #40205 has been rejected.

create implication gatotsu_stance -> hand_to_blade

I think it's fine to imply gatotsu stance to hand to blade, gatotsu stance can be one of the forms of hand to blade.
Although some of the posts, like post #1117190 post #2515730, should be hand on blade instead of hand to blade, I think this is still within the acceptable range. (also the hand to torpedo)
And there is no need to remove hand to blade from knife or polearm.(like post #8593727 post #9007341)

Any one exception should be enough to disqualify an implication. For example, post #3224369 and post #3766434 don't contain blades, and I could imagine more parodies of this pose using something other than a bladed weapon.

The bulk update request #40205 (forum #348304) has been rejected by @finalwar.

Well, bladeless weapon is more controversial, and it's not easy to tell whether it's hand to blade or hand on blade in some images, so I rejected it.

The bulk update request #40180 (forum #348219) has been approved by @nonamethanks.