BUR: Imply stubble on following facial hair tags

BUR #22103 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication beard_stubble -> stubble
create implication goatee_stubble -> stubble
create implication mustache_stubble -> stubble
create implication sideburns_stubble -> stubble

These are all facial hair tags that are more descriptive stubble tags, yet they do not imply the parent tag for facial hair 'stubble'.

KSG and I also looked at sparse_stubble and it seems like the vast majority is used for indicating sparse facial stubble. Any thoughts on implying this and cleaning up?

I created the relevant wiki pages as well with his guidance. First BUR so forgive me if there are any mistakes.

BUR #22105 has been rejected.

create alias stubble -> facial_stubble
remove alias stubble -> facial_stubble

Additionally, given the currently existing stubble -> facial_hair implication, and the wording of stubble's wiki, it's clear the tag is intended for only facial stubbles, however the tag name suggests it's for any stubble regardless of location. Which is problematic given the existence of tags such as pubic stubble.

Yeah sparse stubble should also imply stubble.

I made all these tags but was waiting on the other facial hair threads to resolve to tackle them. forum #261775

I’m not sure about sideburns stubble implying stubble though because last time many people didn’t consider sideburns region to be facial hair. forum #180751
But I’m not opposed to it.

The bulk update request #22103 (forum #263661) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

KagayakuShiningGate said:

Additionally, given the currently existing stubble -> facial_hair implication, and the wording of stubble's wiki, it's clear the tag is intended for only facial stubbles, however the tag name suggests it's for any stubble regardless of location. Which is problematic given the existence of tags such as pubic stubble.

Have there actually been cases of people using stubble on non-facial stubbles?

Yeah, post #5216569 for instance.
Or more accurately: out of this search (that specific user has been excluded as he is the #1 uploader of the stubble tag and I believe he uses it correctly consistently), I made favgroup #30038, which has 24 posts.
Now, there are surely some posts that still feature males like post #7049091 that feature mistagged non-facial stubble, but if I have to be honest, I don't want to go through heaps of mediocre porn just to prove something.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #22105 (forum #263665) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.