standing leg lock

BUR #18014 has been rejected.

create implication standing_leg_lock -> leg_lock
create implication standing_leg_lock -> lifting_person

Subsets.

Also might need a meme tag.
https://twitter.com/CAFFSTRINK/status/1675639576491180033

punished_K said:

Also might need a meme tag.
https://twitter.com/CAFFSTRINK/status/1675639576491180033

Some are a reference to that, like these two, post #6467778 post #6467786, but definitely not all.

wispydreamer said:

Some are a reference to that, like these two, post #6467778 post #6467786, but definitely not all.

Yeah, sorry. I didn't mean ALL posts should have the meme, just the ones referencing the particular pose/done as reply to it.

I can imagine posts with standing on one leg + single leg leg lock. That would probably qualify under standing leg lock, so I don't know if the implication to lifting person is appropriate here.

nonamethanks said:

I can imagine posts with standing on one leg + single leg leg lock. That would probably qualify under standing leg lock, so I don't know if the implication to lifting person is appropriate here.

I agree. BUR should be edited to just imply leg lock.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #18014 (forum #246437) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

BUR #19086 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication standing_leg_lock -> leg_lock

Doing this for now

The bulk update request #19086 (forum #250673) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #61640 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication reverse_leg_lock -> leg_lock

On that subject, another subtype of leg lock.

The bulk update request #61640 (forum #451393) has been approved by @evazion.