Posted under Tags
BUR #17942 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication mortal_kombat_x -> mortal_kombat
create implication mortal_kombat_11 -> mortal_kombat
create implication mortal_kombat_9 -> mortal_kombat
create implication mortal_kombat_vs_dc_universe -> mortal_kombat
create implication mortal_kombat_trilogy -> mortal_kombat
create implication mortal_kombat_4 -> mortal_kombat
create implication mortal_kombat:_shaolin_monks -> mortal_kombat
Mortal kombat has a series
BUR #17944 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias mortal_kombat -> mortal_kombat_(series)
Series qualifier.
The bulk update request #17942 (forum #246190) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #17944 (forum #246198) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #20127 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication mortal_kombat_1_(2023) -> mortal_kombat_(series)
The game's come out and has received a wiki, so it's time for it to imply the main tag.
The bulk update request #20127 (forum #255182) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #58973 has been rejected.
create implication liu_kang_(fire_god) -> liu_kang
His ascencion to godhood with Raiden in MK 11
Massonia said in forum #437855:
BUR #58973 has been rejected.
create implication liu_kang_(fire_god) -> liu_kang
His ascencion to godhood with Raiden in MK 11
Isn't this just liu_kang mortal_kombat_1_(2023)? What's the point of this, especially when it's a random blue member forcing it?
Damian0358 said in forum #437857:
Isn't this just liu_kang mortal_kombat_1_(2023)? What's the point of this, especially when it's a random blue member forcing it?
AFAIK, same Liu Kang from MK11 to MK1. So I though we can make distinction of it
Massonia said in forum #437869:
AFAIK, same Liu Kang from MK11 to MK1. So I though we can make distinction of it
I don't understand what you're trying to say here. I never claimed that they weren't the same Liu Kang (though whoever made the tag initially tried to nuke Liu Kang from all tagged posts). The reason why I point it out is that liu_kang mortal_kombat_11 has no posts depicting him in the Fire God form as seen in MK11, which means right now all fanart posted is from after MK1's release.
Damian0358 said in forum #437884:
I don't understand what you're trying to say here. I never claimed that they weren't the same Liu Kang (though whoever made the tag initially tried to nuke Liu Kang from all tagged posts). The reason why I point it out is that liu_kang mortal_kombat_11 has no posts depicting him in the Fire God form as seen in MK11, which means right now all fanart posted is from after MK1's release.
I have removed the tag from all posts and I ask that you delete it immediately. I was making a distinction between the new timeline and the past timeline. And it was completely unnecessarily, I'm sorry for the trouble.
Updated by Voidkingdarkhold
Voidkingdarkhold said in forum #437990:
I have removed the tag from all posts and I ask that you delete it immediately. I was making a distinction between the new timeline and the past timeline. And it was completely unnecessarily, I'm sorry for the trouble.
I am not going to remove my message because it was a valid comment to make, but I'll instead use the opportunity to thank you for taking my feedback on the chin and reverting the changes you were making. Don't worry, Voidkingdarkhold, you're still new and learning, you're not causing too much trouble at all. Thank you for your hard work contributing to Danbooru, and I hope you achieve greater as you learn further!
Damian0358 said in forum #438023:
I am not going to remove my message because it was a valid comment to make, but I'll instead use the opportunity to thank you for taking my feedback on the chin and reverting the changes you were making. Don't worry, Voidkingdarkhold, you're still new and learning, you're not causing too much trouble at all. Thank you for your hard work contributing to Danbooru, and I hope you achieve greater as you learn further!
Thank you and I meant the tag by the way, you can go ahead and delete it now if you have the power.
The bulk update request #58976 (forum #437861) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #58973 (forum #437855) has been rejected by @evazion.
