Large Areolae Description

The current description of the Large_Areolae tag says: "When the areola are especially large, taking up more than about half of the breast."
Almost none of the posts with that tag seem to actually match the quantitative part of that description, not even the examples given on the wiki page, and the description is also problematic for breasts of huge size and above. I think the description should be changed.
I would suggest to change it to a comparison to the character's hands/palm instead, requiring it to either match or exceed the areola owner's palm size.

That's not always going to work if the owner's hand is not visible. The description seems totally fine and a lot of the posts do seem befitting. You should be able to tell from tbe image itself if the areola would be considered big or not. I also do not see the problem with how it would affect bigger breasts, yes bigger breasts will have bigger areolae but not all them with big in comparsion to the breast.

Kommandant said:

That's not always going to work if the owner's hand is not visible.

That's an argument, although I would say you can generally infer the size of the hand from the rest of the body, unlike breasts, hand sizes don't vary a lot, except in strong stylizations.

a lot of the posts do seem befitting

I don't know, we must understand the description differently or look at very different tags. Again, even the examples on the wiki page itself aren't fitting it, do you think they are?

yes bigger breasts will have bigger areolae but not all them with big in comparsion to the breast.

That's the opposite of the problem I meant (if I understand what you wrote there right at least), take post #6104251 as an example, we can probably agree that those are large nipples and large areolae, but the areolae make up nowhere near half of the breast, they never do if the breasts are huge enough, that's just how their ratio changes, so the description doesn't really work above a certain size.