EyeViewer said:
There's no need of thinking a lot of the girl being bisexual or a fake lesbian. The issue is that a lot of gay girls irl are not lesbian at all or suddenly feel attraction to a man despites being genuine lesbians (until certain point). But anyways, if you see that the girl in the back is crying due to a cheating so it's because she ever told that she was lesbian, not bisexual.
I probably shouldn't even get into this, but that bit about real women not actually being lesbians is deeply misogynistic. Why do we keep getting people who believe that gay women are only gay because they haven't found the right man to fuck them into being straight?
Regarding the line about cheating, I would imagine, as any sane person should, that if someone is crying over being cheated on, it's because they were cheated on, and not because their partner lied to them about their sexuality.
Well, it seems that people want that tag being faithful to rule34's wiki so I'll make another favgroup more accurate than that one I made.
It's not that I specifically want the tag to be used a certain way, I couldn't really care less if we adopt the tag or not. However, if we are going to adopt a tag used by other communities, then it's important to know how they use it. How other communities define the tag should factor into how we define the tag, to at least some extent. It's not a very useful tag if anyone familiar with it can't find what they expect to find with it because we're using it differently from how everyone else is using it.
The R34 definition, I feel, is actually the ideal way for us to use it. The way you seem to be suggesting we use it is heavily reliant on canon knowledge, which isn't how we tag things. Your way of using it would just include most of yuri, yaoi, and hetero. If context present within the image isn't mandatory, then you could put the tag on almost anything, which isn't useful.