BUR #8953 has been rejected.
create alias stuffed_animal -> stuffed_toy
stuffed_animal makes up about 90% of stuffed_toy; there's no reason to have one tag for all stuffed toys and another tag for the vast majority of them.
Posted under Tags
BUR #8953 has been rejected.
create alias stuffed_animal -> stuffed_toy
stuffed_animal makes up about 90% of stuffed_toy; there's no reason to have one tag for all stuffed toys and another tag for the vast majority of them.
The solution to that is to tag the exceptions, not the overwhelmingly more common example. This is like having a non-inverted_nipples tag that implies nipples instead of just using inverted_nipples.
So you want a non-animal stuffed toy tag?
I stumbled onto this post because of the downvotes, don't really care about the tags but I agree with AngryZapdos's sentiment here,
I looked at like couple pages of stuffed_animal/stuffed_toy/"-stuffed_animal stuffed_toy" and either it's mistagged a lot or that I don't see the difference.
Having them divided into two different tags would be more preferable as like "non-animal stuffed toy" or something with a better name.
And also we are literally doing the same thing this BUR suggests because holding stuffed animal is aliased to holding stuffed toy.
I can't even search for a post that has a character holding stuffed animal while there's a stuffed toy laying around like post #4208928.
And I surely won't be able to find this image if I were to search "-stuffed_animal stuffed_toy".
It makes more sense to me to divide and garden them into two tags as said before and have this alias pass.
The bulk update request #8953 (forum #205953) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.