update hair_over_one_eye -> hair_over_one_eye one_eye_covered

BUR #7700 has been rejected.

mass update hair_over_one_eye -> hair_over_one_eye one_eye_covered

In my opinion, the one_eye_covered tag is a more comprehensive concept than each *_over_one_eye tag. But the number of posts is not the same as I thought.

hair_over_one_eye : 104104
one_eye_covered : 8415
hair_over_one_eye -one_eye_covered : 101141

I couldn't understand the number of posts in hair_over_one_eye -one_eye_covered.
These two tags should be used together. I couldn't request 'imply', so I ask for 'update'.

P.S
Every time a new *_over_one_eye tag is created, do We have to request a new update? I'm curious about this.

Counterpoint: hair_over_one_eye eyes_visible_through_hair.

Also topic #19487 for reference.

This is kind of normal, just keeping it.

nonamethanks said:

Counterpoint: hair_over_one_eye eyes_visible_through_hair.

Also topic #19487 for reference.

Thanks for mentioning the ref.
That topic's conclusion is that one_eye_covered means a narrower meaning in the sense that it's "fully" covered, right?

The main issue with this request is that there's posts like post #4778928 where it's covered eyes instead of one eye covered.

The bulk update request #7700 (forum #199029) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.