Planted implications

Posted under Tags

BUR #5162 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication planted_arrow -> planted
create implication planted_umbrella -> planted
create implication planted_spear -> planted
create implication planted_shovel -> planted
create implication planted_axe -> planted
create implication planted_arrow -> arrow_(projectile)
create implication planted_spear -> spear
create implication planted_shovel -> shovel
create implication planted_axe -> axe

You've heard of holding_* tags, now get ready for...!

I haven't added planted_sword and planted_weapon because of the 90% rule, although most of these tags imply it already.

BUR #5626 has been approved by @evazion.

remove implication planted_weapon -> weapon
create alias planted_weapon -> planted

Simplify the tagging hierarchy. Instead of planted sword -> planted weapon -> planted, just have planted sword -> planted. I'll do the other implications if we get rid of planted weapon first.

Some things, like knives or axes, can be either tools or weapons. So things like planted knife -> planted weapon are wrong, because knife doesn't imply weapon.

Planted by itself may be a confusing name, we might want to call it planted object or something instead. Or maybe sword in ground / object in ground.

A glance through planted umbrella shows it's not used in a planted manner at all—the majority of the posts under it are either out-of-frame or where the umbrella is just resting against the ground (post #3796803 for example) rather than actually "planted" (post #4661933). As a result nearly the entire tag is mistagged with planted now. Should we have a separate "umbrella_against_ground"-type tag? Or repurpose this tag?

Also perhaps unrelated but ~75% of the tag was added by user #384355 and a large amount of posts under beach umbrella could probably be tagged with this.

1