kia'ra said:
post #4608503
loli?
Leaning towards no.
Posted under General
kia'ra said:
post #4608503
loli?
Leaning towards no.
Left at loli for now.
Most definitely not loli:
post #4620375
post #4620565
post #3288900
Debatable
post #4624542
SionJack said:
post #4617742 ? - Left at loli for now.
Probably yes.
Talulah said:
post #4625322 and post #4625343?
Leaning towards yes.
I think post #3466744 is wrongly tagged, as the character doesn't have any traits that could mistake it with a loli.
papajohn123 said:
I think post #3466744 is wrongly tagged, as the character doesn't have any traits that could mistake it with a loli.
Not a loli to me. Was also added by some random.
I'm not sure about the proportions, and rensyu almost only draws loli, so I'm unsure.
0xC0FFEE said:
I'm not sure about the proportions, and rensyu almost only draws loli, so I'm unsure.
It might just be the face, but that looks like a grown woman imo
yyflandre said:
Adult thighs and underaged upper torso. Gona go with no.
I'd normally assume this counts but I'm not 100% sure since all the details of the boy are erased out in the lewd panel
loli/rating check for post #4640228 and children
kittey said:
loli/rating check for post #4640228 and children
i would say it warrants more of a child tag. maybe a younger tag could be used.
( i dont know enough about the characters age, Im just going by visual appearances. )
As for the rating, i don't see anything that goes with the Explicit or Questionable rating.
SenpaiGalaxy said:
i would say it warrants more of a child tag. maybe a younger tag could be used.
( i dont know enough about the characters age, Im just going by visual appearances. )
We don't care about canon age when using tags like loli or child, only appearance, and younger is for characters being depicted younger than their standard appearance.
blindVigil said:
younger is for characters being depicted younger than their standard appearance.
Thank you for the correction. So for clarification, A character that normally is 21 years of age being depicted as a 10 year old would get the younger tag?
If so i don't know why i had a massive brain fart for that..
blindVigil said:
We don't care about canon age when using tags like loli or child, only appearance.
I do remember that from the Tag Wiki. Rule of Thumb.