Dogpile, pile-up and Human stacking

BUR #3147 has been rejected.

create implication human_stacking -> take_your_pick
create alias dogpile -> stacking
create alias pile-up -> stacking

Dogpile and pile-up seem redundant. I would like to see human stacking to be the sexually charged one and dogpile and pile-up to be covered by stacking.

Some gardening would need to be done to dogpile and pile-up for this. I can gladly do this but I wanted to get feedback on it first.

Human stacking implicating take your pick it's just per the wiki.

Human tower's wiki would have it's last line for sexually suggestive human towers to be tagged as dogpile deleted.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3147 (forum #170478) has been rejected by @evazion.

I'd rather have dogpile and pile-up aliased together (don't feel strongly which one) instead of eliminated into stacking. Else you'll lose the loose piles of bodies such as post #3941535, post #2572272, or even post #1694493.

For neat ass stacks, you'd then use human_stacking. -1 on the implication to take_your_pick though; as lewd as post #2626026 might be, there's nothing that suggests imminent sexy times.

Stacking seems like a really odd choice of words to use for posts where characters are just lying atop each other in a heap, like post #1856798, post #1519966, and post #3641272. Usually when I hear "stacking", I think of something more orderly and less random.

Also, I don't understand why you'd want to keep a tag exclusively for sexual images of human stacks, yet you'd keep the nonsexual human stacks in the same tag as inanimate objects like post #3736686. Dividing them up along this particular line is frankly kind of bizarre.

I'm also opposed to aliasing dogpile, it implies something a lot messier than stacking, stacking is usually at least some degree of coordinated.

Human stacking's wiki should probably be rewritten, it's a bit awkward, and the line about take your pick being mandatory doesn't fit when it's not always specifically sexual.

-1 on the implication to take_your_pick though; as lewd as post #2626026 might be, there's nothing that suggests imminent sexy times.

Why? It literally says to tag take your pick along with Human_stacking. Out of anything here it should be the most straight forward change.

iridescent_slime said:
Also, I don't understand why you'd want to keep a tag exclusively for sexual images of human stacks, yet you'd keep the nonsexual human stacks in the same tag as inanimate objects like post #3736686. Dividing them up along this particular line is frankly kind of bizarre.

Right now, with mostly dogpile, it's being used interchangeably with human_stacking. If a tag isn't unique, why have it? You have two tags that essentially mean the same thing, both with sexual intent for showing genitalia stacked on-top of each other.

I've gone ahead and changed the wiki for dogpile to make it clearer that they're not organized, as found in stacking, and I've removed posts of organized stacks or human_stacking. I'm not sure at what point sexual intent was supposedly added to dogpile's definition, but that was an extremely poor addition that both restricts the tag to sexual content and at the same time makes it only covers posts that people would not expect under the term (which follows through given about half the posts did not match this sexual definition). Given this, it seemed necessary to change dogpile's definition and to also removed the line from human_tower that implies dogpile is only meant for posts of a sexual nature.

I support Hillside Moose, iridescent slime, and blindVigil's opinions on this. dogpile and pile-up could potentially be combined, but trying to fold them into stacking seems like a bad idea given that stacking implies some degree of organization, while both dogpile and pile-up imply a lack of organization.

NWF_Renim said:

...dogpile and pile-up could potentially be combined, but trying to fold them into stacking seems like a bad idea given that stacking implies some degree of organization, while both dogpile and pile-up imply a lack of organization.

I would be fine with this scenario. And thank you for the wiki edits. As I stated in my OP they needed to be changed.

The bulk update request #3147 (forum #170478) has been rejected by @evazion.

BUR #3245 has been approved by @evazion.

create alias pile-up -> dogpile

As per above.

I think dogpile, stacking, human stacking, and human tower should all be separate tags. Stacking should be for inanimate objects, dogpile for piles of people, human tower for standing towers of people, and human stacking for the fetish of stacking asses or pussies together.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3245 (forum #171163) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #3245 (forum #171163) has been approved by @evazion.