Id like to know why this was deleted. The quality is just as good if not better than all of the other artwork the artist has uploaded here.
Posted under General
Id like to know why this was deleted. The quality is just as good if not better than all of the other artwork the artist has uploaded here.
zangalus2005 said:
Id like to know why this was deleted. The quality is just as good if not better than all of the other artwork the artist has uploaded here.
That is a horrifically out of proportion ribcage area, especially with how large those breasts are.
Seemed ok to me, and all the other posts by the artist were fine.
post #3683393
I uploaded this a few days ago, but apparently it's considered to have poor quality. I mean, I undestand it's not very detailed, but that's different than being 'poorly-drawn', at least to me. But I am new to this site, so if that image really wasn't good, I'll understand.
Updated by RMXFan102
RMXFan102 said:
post #3683393
I uploaded this a few days ago, but apparently it's considered to have poor quality. I mean, I undestand it's not very detailed, but that's different than being 'poorly-drawn', at least to me. But I am new to this site, so it that image really wasn't good, I'll understand.
It's got a super flat-style of coloring that is in direct odds with the weird diamond texture filter that was slapped over the character layer. Breasts don't really work in the way they're depicted here and the legs on Asuka aren't in alignment with the rest of how her body is facing.
The tagging you did for the image was pretty good for a newcomer.
ygm_1 said:
Seemed ok to me, and all the other posts by the artist were fine.
Upload from pixiv if you can. The same picture there is usually higher in quality.
Elfaleon said:
It's got a super flat-style of coloring that is in direct odds with the weird diamond texture filter that was slapped over the character layer. Breasts don't really work in the way they're depicted here and the legs on Asuka aren't in alignment with the rest of how her body is facing.
Alright, then. I'll keep that in mind in the future.
Elfaleon said:
The tagging you did for the image was pretty good for a newcomer.
Thanks!
Their not mine uploads but can someone give these a look?
post #3673939(parent)
post #3673944(child)
post #3673949
Chimera99 said:
Their not mine uploads but can someone give these a look?
This topic is for giving feedback to uploaders. Please use topic #8554 to appeal posts.
(No need to appeal these three posts in topic #8554 now, though, since most of the approvers reading that topic also read this one.)
I wanted to ask for feedback on this post because I think its quite cute and matches the high quality of the artist's other posts on here, if not even better, and better than a lot of the art for the same series too. There is other furry content onsite, so I don't think that is it.
I'd like to know what's wrong so I can post in the future. Thank you!
I want to know why post #3693343 was not approved. I thought it was fine.
was a commission its buyer felt like reposting on /r/dfo. i would assume paying for art carries with it some assumption that it's drawn well, but i guess that's not the case here?
thanks in advance for the help.
freecom said:
i would assume paying for art carries with it some assumption that it's drawn well, but i guess that's not the case here?
Well, no. If someone pays me to make a shit drawing of a stick figure, it’s still a shit drawing of a stick figure. Paying for it doesn’t mean that the result will be good. Also, you could pay an artist to paint your portrait in oil: You might have paid for a great painting, but it would be off-topic for Danbooru.
Leaving that aside and looking at the image at hand, it’s not great but looks okay to me. Maybe it will catch an approver’s fancy after all.
Anyone want to tell me why this was deleted?
I really hate the opaqueness of this process, and how harshly you're punished. This is part of a 3 image set, so I get -3 to my ratio for basically one upload.
Updated by Chimera99
post #3692403
I concur with 727272's statement, particularly on the vagueness of it. If the approvers had to explain their decisions, no matter how succintly, I wouldn't need to post here. 43 tags down the drain...
Oh, and someone really ought to answer Purrloin, VR-man, 727272 and Chimera99 already!
RMXFan102 said:
Western art of western copyrights rarely gets approved. This is an anime-style board after all.
727272 said:
Anyone want to tell me why this was deleted?
Chimera99 said:
Can someone tell me this one didn't get approved?
Because no approvers liked it enough or thought it was high enough quality to approve it.
727272 said:
and how harshly you're punished. This is part of a 3 image set, so I get -3 to my ratio for basically one upload.
If you're unsure of approval, upload only the main variation. If it's approved, upload the others.
RMXFan102 said:
If the approvers had to explain their decisions, no matter how succintly, I wouldn't need to post here.
We clicked the button showing we lack interest in the post, thought it was poor quality, or against the rules. Pretty succinct, but befitting your request.
RMXFan102 said:
Oh, and someone really ought to answer Purrloin, VR-man, 727272 and Chimera99 already!
Rule #1 for requesting feedback is outlined in the opening post of this thread.
All, consider this: as of this posting, we have 51 users with the ability to approve posts and it is their duty to do so based entirely on their personal perception of quality and interest. Would it be feasible to require even a majority of them to comment on why they didn't accept each of the 269+ posts deleted in the last 7 days? I don't mean to impress that the approval system is "fair" in any kind of way; it really isn't. But it is what it is, it's one of the core workings of the site, and demanding that you receive an answer to why your posts are deleted usually doesn't even earn as much as this reply.