Koishichan said:
Could someone please translate this for me along with my other deleted posts?
Posted under General
Koishichan said:
Could someone please translate this for me along with my other deleted posts?
There are several pictures in pool #14803 that weren't approved I and would really like to have some feedback on that part. From what I can see those pics are on par with the rest ~100 pictures in the pool that were approved both in style and art quality (some of the approved ones are even worse methink), so what gives?
Posts are:
post #3482236
post #3566173
post #3591514
post #3628674
My recent post was rejected for being low quality; I've had a few deletions so I was wondering what was wrong with it so I could refrain from uploading non-DB-friendly pics in the future
SevenandForty said:
My recent post was rejected for being low quality; I've had a few deletions so I was wondering what was wrong with it so I could refrain from uploading non-DB-friendly pics in the future
It looks okay at a glance, but there is a torso and a half on her. I think the top half of the picture would have been approved in spite of the sketchy background.
kittey said:
Images from Twitter have more artifacts and generally aren’t approved once the superior Pixiv version is up. Going straight for the Twitter version is risky when an artist is known to upload to both Twitter and Pixiv.
Sometimes I see a bar-censored Pixiv copy and a uncensored Twitter copy. Would the uncensored Twitter copy likely be approved even if posted after the Pixiv version? I would think so, but I don't want to waste an upload if not.
Updated
g3gen said:
Sometimes I see a bar-censored Pixiv copy and a uncensored Twitter copy. Would the uncensored Twitter copy likely be approved even if posted after the Pixiv version? I would think so, but I don't want to waste an upload if not.
If it’s an uncensored version by the author and not a third-party decensor, it would probably get approved. No promises, though.
Can anyone give me feedback on why post #3635359 got rejected.
Guaro1238 said:
Monochrome sketches are in general far less likely to be approved than other stuff (one or the other would reduce the chance but both is a bit of a killer). Aside from that, her lower torso would have to be bent at an extremely unnatural (and almost certainly impossible) angle to produce the shirt line that we see under the jacket in combination with the position of the skirt. Her left breast is too cylindrical as well (I'd say her right one is just about excusable considering that she's obviously pressing against something, but the left is way longer and thus way more tubular).
Please recheck post #3634776 against post #3644481 and please tell me what I got wrong.
It was the reason I did not upload it when I had the chance. If there is nothing visibly wrong with the artwork (artefacts etc.) I'd like to appeal the rejection.
Updated
g3gen said:
Please recheck post #3634776 against post #3644481 and please tell me what I got wrong.
What's the deal with her right hand? It seems flattened and her fingers taper into needles.
Also, there's a certain something about her shoulder anatomy that just seems... off. It's like the artist wanted to draw her armpit with really deep creases but without the requisite musculature. They probably should have used a photo reference, because this area seems to be their weakness.
iridescent_slime said:
What's the deal with her right hand? It seems flattened and her fingers taper into needles.
Also, there's a certain something about her shoulder anatomy that just seems... off. It's like the artist wanted to draw her armpit with really deep creases but without the requisite musculature. They probably should have used a photo reference, because this area seems to be their weakness.
Ok. Didn't notice that. Appreciate the feedback.
Okay, why the 9 approvers reviewed it and 3 approvers scored that, but Why Nobody approve this images?