[REJECTED] Tag implication: lace-trimmed_sleeves -> lace

create implication lace-trimmed_sleeves -> lace

Link to implication

Various other lace-trimmed_x tags already implicate lace. I see no reason why this one would be any different.

The tag implication lace-trimmed_sleeves -> lace has been rejected.

Most lace-trimmed_* -> lace implications were created as a result of topic #12934, without any discussion.
The reason cited in that bulk was previously existing lace implications, but they were never discussed either. See: topic #5499, topic #11553, topic #11585.

We also have lace_trim tag, and I think that it would be much better to use it as an umbrella for various lace-trimmed_* tags.

Then we can keep lace specifically for clothing that is made out of it, e.g. lace_bra, lace_panties, lace_gloves, lace_legwear.

What do others think?

+1 to implicating lace trim instead of lace. The other *-trimmed tags, ribbon-trimmed_* and fur-trimmed_*, implicate ribbon trim and fur trim, not ribbon or fur.

Speaking of lace-trimm...Is there any significant different between this and the lace tag?
Or is this treated like frilled_* and frills? Because frilled_* can be considered as frill_trim.

Lace is a material, it can be used as a trim or as a primary material. Don't make a frill_trim tag, frills are literally always trim.

I concur with @MyrMindservant 's assessment. +1 to implying lace trim, -1 to implying lace.

The tag implication lace-trimmed_sleeves -> lace has been rejected.