create implication own_hands_together -> hands_together
See the wiki entries that mention that own_hands_together is a special case of hands_together.
Posted under Tags
create implication own_hands_together -> hands_together
See the wiki entries that mention that own_hands_together is a special case of hands_together.
-1
own_hands_together could come with interlocked_fingers
hands_together : "without the fingers being interlocked"
zeparoh said:
-1
own_hands_together could come with interlocked_fingers
hands_together : "without the fingers being interlocked"
And why is this a reason against it? Who says hands_together can't also be interlocked? Doesn't really makes sense for me since I can without problem use both of this on the same picture.
Or is this again some kind of language thing that one doesn't use interlocked fingers if it's their own hands are together?
erh, That's how its wiki is.
interlocked fingers , hands together and hands clasped have pretty specific wikis and link together. I don't know why but "fingers interlocked", and "palms touching" are important points to define those tags (base on their wiki, which often confuse me).
If own_hands_together be linked to them, I think hands together's wiki should be changed first.
I'm not really againts it, just point out how hands together is used or at least how its wiki is.
Beside that, If the "fingers interlocked" part is removed and own_hands_together's implicated to it, isn't hands together just own_hands_together and holding hands combine ?