post #1780585
Hard to tell if they're more androgynous or prepubescent.
Posted under General
post #1780585
Hard to tell if they're more androgynous or prepubescent.
Not sure about post #1781472. She has breasts but the proportions are kind of childlike and the artist has a history of drawing loli.
Not sure why this is tagged loli. I saw the image on /a/ today and there's nothing super-explicit unless the see-through and pantyshot are enough to get it tagged loli?
Not quite loli imo, even the content is hardly even questionable.
post #1808470 and its children.
The girl with brown hair looks no younger than her blue-haired friend. She just has small breasts.
md5:ba9df1c67f2a0b382b52aa49f6e2dc1f
Obvious breasts. ling_xiaoyu is usually not loli, just much shorter than kazama_jin.
post #453648 checked the pixiv link and transated. not loli.
Vezon_The_Insane said:
post #453648 checked the pixiv link and transated. not loli.
It's not sexually explicit but it is very suggestive which is enough to warrant the loli tag.
post #1830322
Looks like loli to me.
post #1839151 tagged to be safe, would appreciate input.
Same character.
Second opinion needed on post #1877743
Visible nipples (see-through) on prepubescent character (Northern Ocean Hime).
Went ahead and tagged first to be safe than sorry, would appreciate input.
Tag doesn't really need to be on this.
post #1924097 - not sure, but I tagged it to be safe.