Yo, I'm worried if the artist is likely actually aware that this guy is like an actual school shooter. If the the artist is actually aware, I'm more deeply worried that this artist is one of those kinds of people...
Yo, I'm worried if the artist is likely actually aware that this guy is like an actual school shooter. If the the artist is actually aware, I'm more deeply worried that this artist is one of those kinds of people...
I retract my doubt over this artist. She definitely does worship this school shooter by looking at her tumblr.
yo why are you posting this girl's art of a school shooter from Tumblr to Danbooru bruh?
Been apart of TCC (true crime community) since 2024, died down in 2025 then revived earlier this year and it has been my recent bias since. You can see the tag, true crime in which most posts under this tag were uploaded by me. My first true crime post was post #9309715 from last year of this month that depicts Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, the Columbine shooters.
Most if not all of the Seung-Hui Cho, Adam Lanza, Salvador Ramos, Eric Harris, Dylan Klebold, Robert Hawkins, Natalie Rupnow, etc posts were uploaded by me. Now why would someone draw fanart of a murderer or be apart of the TCC? You can read here. I'd say it's similar to why someone would draw Adolf Hitler, Nazis or a politician.
Either way, posting fanart of school shooters (or murderers in general) aren't against the upload rules since someone tried to flag them for that exact reason and approvers' messages said it wasn't a valid flag and some even got approved by moderators.
alexr05 said in comment #2603995: You can read here. I'd say it's similar to why someone would draw Adolf Hitler, Nazis or a politician.
You know, when I clicked this link, I didn't think it was going to basically be, "Yeah, a lot of us are just genuinely sexually obsessed with the literal dregs of society, and I just think they were really cool people, even though they were mentally unstable murderers, because they murdered apolitically. Politically motivated murder is just so blasé. Also, the people that glorify the murders themselves are usually right wingers (yeah I'm sure that one's not biased)."
I mean, respect for the honesty, I guess.
Also you know people get judged really harshly for obsessively drawing Hitler and Nazi imagery, right?
and I just think they were really cool people, even though they were mentally unstable murderers
Lots of incels like Elliot Rodger because they relate to his struggles or people who felt socially rejected like Seung-Hui Cho as seen with his manifesto as it's way more than merely liking their attacks but them as a person because their struggles in life are relatable to a lot of people or because they genuinely interest people such as Adam Lanza since even when people found his Youtube channel in September 2021, we still don't know exactly why he did it but he had many interesting beliefs and sayings. It's true most of them were mentally unstable but why were they like that in the first place? That's also what intrigues TCCers and get people to like them because they relate to them. Adam Lanza was mentally unstable but at the same time, he was academically intelligent but was profoundly socially and emotionally distressed. The perp and their victims are their own person too with distinct personalities and character traits, it's no different from reducing them to a mere murderer just as reducing the victims as numbers. The TCC was originally people discussing, posting informative information and researching the perps they're interested in and that is still true to an extent today.
Politically motivated murder is just so blasé. Also, the people that glorify the murders themselves are usually right wingers (yeah I'm sure that one's not biased)."
There's others I like who happen to be right-wing and politically motivated, I meant that I dislike LARPers like most of the newgen perps like Caleb Vazquez, Natalie Rupnow, etc. I'm interested in apolitical ones more since they're more likely to be their own person not copy and pasted from Brenton Tarrant or Anders Breivik as Seung-Hui Cho, Adam Lanza and Salvador Ramos were apolitical but were vastly different people in their own regard. It's more of so observation that right-wingers tend to glorify murderers who targetted minorities as some TCC centrists/leftists also glorify murderers but the murderers they glorify tend to target random general people than targetting a specific group of people. It's seen with right-wingers celebrating the attempted trans suicide rate. The ones I've mentioned such as Brenton Tarrant, Anders Breivik, etc tend to have way more right-wing fans on average compared to someone who was apolitical like Adam Lanza who has an equal amount of right-wing and left-wing fans. You can see this with how Adolf Hitler's fans are extremely disproportionally right-wing.
BTW, important, when I say "glorify" in this context, I mean actively supporting and praising them for what they did instead of drawing fanart of them or liking them as people since some people consider those to be mild forms of glorification as a decent amount of TCCers say they don't condone as in don't support what they did.
That's what I mean by the TCC is very diverse as there's racist TCCers/perps and TCCers/perps of that race they hate, homophobic and gay/bi TCCers/perps, transphobic and trans TCCers/perps, misogynistic and female TCCers/perps. I've met TCCers all over the political spectrum (although, most of them were right-wing Nazis). There's differences in how female and TCCers behave as female TCCers are more likely to be romantically or sexually interested in the perps while male TCCers are more likely to condone and praise perps and be right-wing overall.
Also you know people get judged really harshly for obsessively drawing Hitler and Nazi imagery, right?
Yeah I know, I mean like non/anti-TCCers telling me to stop posting true crime fanart in the comment sections despite there being Nazi fanart on the website unless they also get told to stop posting Nazi fanart but I don't check the Nazi tag often.
The TCC isn't innocent. New mass shooters are aware that a group of disturbed individuals will worship them for no other reason than their crime, and reference past shooters as "saints." See: the San Diego mosque shooters 2 weeks ago, which is about when I first noticed your posts.
You bring up the existence of nazi posts as an excuse to post these. To be fair, they are also offensive, and it sets a precedent that offensiveness isn't enough of a reason to delete it. It's unfortunate that black cat03 posts seem to have some positive ratings and defenders on here with the repetitive shtick of drawing anime girls in Nazi uniforms (even if it's unrelated to their character and not even a joke), while his art quality now looks pixelated IMO.
But this true crime stuff sticks out for other reasons too. Sometimes it's mediocre art-wise. Other times, it shows little to no Japanese influence. In any case, it has no connection to fictional franchises. If this stuff isn't off-topic, it seems like a borderline case!
The TCC isn't innocent. New mass shooters are aware that a group of disturbed individuals will worship them for no other reason than their crime, and reference past shooters as "saints." See: the San Diego mosque shooters 2 weeks ago, which is about when I first noticed your posts.
Those are a subset of people in the TCC who're typically right-wing Nazis, that's what I mean they usually glorify in my Dmail. I've met TCCers who don't condone what they did and feel bad for the victims themselves. I've said before that the TCC is very diverse with everyone being all over the political spectrum, stances and behaviors. Just because you see a subsection of a community do something doesn't mean all of them do that.
You bring up the existence of nazi posts as an excuse to post these. To be fair, they are also offensive, and it sets a precedent that offensiveness isn't enough of a reason to delete it. It's unfortunate that black cat03 posts seem to have some positive ratings and defenders on here with the repetitive shtick of drawing anime girls in Nazi uniforms (even if it's unrelated to their character and not even a joke), while his art quality now looks pixelated IMO.
Yes because it's not the artwork itself, it's the person and how they chose to view that content. Anti-lolicons/anti-shotacons use the same argument for why loli/shota art should be banned because some pedophile already into real children might look at loli/shota art and eventually want to rape a real child despite already being into real children beforehand. It's not the artwork itself but the person themselves. Just because a pedophile already into real children consumes loli/shota doesn't mean all lolicons/shotacons want to fuck real children similar how someone looking at true crime/or nazi posts doesn't mean they will become the next mass shooter or become a nazi.
But this true crime stuff sticks out for other reasons too. Sometimes it's mediocre art-wise. Other times, it shows little to no Japanese influence. In any case, it has no connection to fictional franchises. If this stuff isn't off-topic, it seems like a borderline case!
Animification exists, there's anime-styled artworks drawn by Westerners and toon-styled artworks drawn by Easterners. (in this case, the Japanese) post #8138156 and post #11116588 were drawn by Japanese artists as seen in commentary, yet, they don't resemble anime whatsoever. If you're talkin about Japanese artists, what about non-Japanese Asian artists such as Chinese or Korean artists? naturalselector91 isn't a Japanese artist but draws in the anime artstyle nonetheless. post #11310278 got flagged for being off-topic twice despite being drawn by a Japanese artist.
Leave a comment