Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? orihi chihiro 414

Copyright

  • ? kantai collection 540k

Characters

  • ? shoukaku (kancolle) 6.9k
  • ? zuikaku (kancolle) 10k

General

  • ? 2girls 1.4M
  • ? areola slip 73k
  • ? arms behind back 121k
  • ? bikini 674k
  • ? blush 4.0M
  • ? breasts 4.8M
  • ? collarbone 1.1M
  • ? condom 45k
  • ? condom in mouth 7.1k
  • ? condom wrapper 20k
  • ? grey hair 993k
  • ? hair tie 32k
  • ? hairband 680k
  • ? hand on another's shoulder 41k
  • ? large breasts 2.2M
  • ? long hair 6.0M
  • ? looking at viewer 4.7M
  • ? micro bikini 58k
  • ? mouth hold 98k
  • ? multiple girls 2.0M
  • ? navel 1.6M
  • ? red bikini 45k
  • ? siblings 162k
  • ? sisters 96k
  • ? skindentation 158k
  • ? small breasts 693k
  • ? smile 4.0M
  • ? swimsuit 882k
  • ? white bikini 131k
  • ? white hair 1.0M
  • ? yellow eyes 987k

Meta

  • ? bad id 1.4M
  • ? ↳ bad twitter id 245k
  • ? jpeg artifacts 27k

Information

  • ID: 2728874
  • Uploader: used 491970 »
  • Date: about 9 years ago
  • Approver: .grey »
  • Size: 69.6 KB .jpg (646x954) »
  • Source: x.com/orihi_/status/865517096016293895 »
  • Rating: Questionable
  • Score: 43
  • Favorites: 59
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
zuikaku and shoukaku (kantai collection) drawn by orihi_chihiro
  • ‹ prev Search: condom_wrapper next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    .grey
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Indeed the artifacting is pretty awful... but not awful enough to warrant deletion. It would need to be much worse.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 509825
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Mikaeri said:

    Indeed the artifacting is pretty awful... but not awful enough to warrant deletion. It would need to be much worse.

    This flag reason is also only valid on third party edits and not for Twitter recompression.
    But even then one should find a better version first.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    .grey
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Provence said:

    This flag reason is also only valid on third party edits and not for Twitter recompression.
    But even then one should find a better version first.

    You're right, but to make this extremely clear: Twitter artifacts the original image a lot, that's a given. But for an image to be deleted because of artifacts, it needs to be either very bad -- on fault of the original artist (if they've really really messed up how to properly export their image), or from a third-party website or reposting site which would induce further resampling. A reupload of a Twitter sample on Twitter, for example.

    Or a sample of a reupload of a Twitter sample from another Twitter sample that was reuploaded from the original tweet, for further obfuscation :^) (and this is why we emphasis links to tweets, not images!)

    In any case, lot of artists make it a habit to collect their posts on Twitter first and then batch them all to upload. Most of the time it isn't worth waiting so long anyway, but that depends on the artist of course ;)

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link

    Leave a comment

    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /