Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? orihi chihiro 402

Copyright

  • ? kantai collection 534k

Characters

  • ? shoukaku (kancolle) 6.9k
  • ? zuikaku (kancolle) 10k

General

  • ? 2girls 1.3M
  • ? areola slip 70k
  • ? arms behind back 115k
  • ? bikini 645k
  • ? blush 3.8M
  • ? breasts 4.6M
  • ? collarbone 1.0M
  • ? condom 43k
  • ? condom in mouth 6.9k
  • ? condom wrapper 20k
  • ? grey hair 955k
  • ? hair tie 30k
  • ? hairband 651k
  • ? hand on another's shoulder 40k
  • ? large breasts 2.1M
  • ? long hair 5.8M
  • ? looking at viewer 4.6M
  • ? micro bikini 56k
  • ? mouth hold 96k
  • ? multiple girls 2.0M
  • ? navel 1.5M
  • ? red bikini 43k
  • ? skindentation 153k
  • ? small breasts 665k
  • ? smile 3.9M
  • ? swimsuit 846k
  • ? white bikini 124k
  • ? white hair 968k
  • ? yellow eyes 948k

Meta

  • ? bad id 1.4M
  • ? ↳ bad twitter id 237k
  • ? jpeg artifacts 27k

Information

  • ID: 2728874
  • Uploader: used 491970 »
  • Date: almost 9 years ago
  • Approver: .grey »
  • Size: 69.6 KB .jpg (646x954) »
  • Source: x.com/orihi_/status/865517096016293895 »
  • Rating: Questionable
  • Score: 43
  • Favorites: 59
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
zuikaku and shoukaku (kantai collection) drawn by orihi_chihiro
  • ‹ prev Search: status:any next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    .grey
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Indeed the artifacting is pretty awful... but not awful enough to warrant deletion. It would need to be much worse.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 509825
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Mikaeri said:

    Indeed the artifacting is pretty awful... but not awful enough to warrant deletion. It would need to be much worse.

    This flag reason is also only valid on third party edits and not for Twitter recompression.
    But even then one should find a better version first.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    .grey
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Provence said:

    This flag reason is also only valid on third party edits and not for Twitter recompression.
    But even then one should find a better version first.

    You're right, but to make this extremely clear: Twitter artifacts the original image a lot, that's a given. But for an image to be deleted because of artifacts, it needs to be either very bad -- on fault of the original artist (if they've really really messed up how to properly export their image), or from a third-party website or reposting site which would induce further resampling. A reupload of a Twitter sample on Twitter, for example.

    Or a sample of a reupload of a Twitter sample from another Twitter sample that was reuploaded from the original tweet, for further obfuscation :^) (and this is why we emphasis links to tweets, not images!)

    In any case, lot of artists make it a habit to collect their posts on Twitter first and then batch them all to upload. Most of the time it isn't worth waiting so long anyway, but that depends on the artist of course ;)

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link

    Leave a comment

    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /