Tag implication: toes -> feet

create implication toes -> feet

Link to implication

I don't think it's possible for toes to be noticeable without feet also being noticeable.

Examples of toes without visible feet: post #542322, post #396530, post #441144, post #186212, post #80094,

Also don't think these should also be tagged feet because of minor visibility of feet or them being mostly covered up in shoes: post #372947, post #149759, post #31512

I oppose this implication because I can easily imagine eventually seeing disembodied toes, or a drawing of this creature: http://crawl.akrasiac.org/learndb.html#curse_toe

anon153 said:

I oppose this implication because I can easily imagine eventually seeing disembodied toes, or a drawing of this creature: http://crawl.akrasiac.org/learndb.html#curse_toe

I doubt either of those are going to appear on Danbooru.

NWF_Renim said:

Also don't think these should also be tagged feet because of minor visibility of feet or them being mostly covered up in shoes: post #372947, post #149759, post #31512

Yeah, that's true. Never mind then.