Danbooru

Loli/shota check thread.

Posted under General

post #7235989 and children
These technically aren't sexual and might not count for shota, but the character is drawn in a shotaesque way in all of these posts, not to mention post #7235999 has a POV of him pinning the viewer. At the very least, I think it's too suggestive for child.

岩戸鈴芽 said:

Nothing really making it loli, just flat-chested.

She looks pretty young and the open shirt is at least a bit suggestive.

Blank_User said:

post #7235989 and children
These technically aren't sexual and might not count for shota, but the character is drawn in a shotaesque way in all of these posts, not to mention post #7235999 has a POV of him pinning the viewer. At the very least, I think it's too suggestive for child.

She looks pretty young and the open shirt is at least a bit suggestive.

Blank, I didn't label it shota because the artist in question doesn't want it to be considered shota. So please don't anybody change it

jay19 said:

Blank, I didn't label it shota because the artist in question doesn't want it to be considered shota. So please don't anybody change it

That's not how we do things. We're gonna tag it the way we think it should be tagged, artist's don't get a say in how we use our tags.

blindVigil said:

That's not how we do things. We're gonna tag it the way we think it should be tagged, artist's don't get a say in how we use our tags.

Well sure. I'm just letting you know, the artist prefers sfw boys or rather sfwish...?

new to this thread but I'm tired of seeing untagged loli. I somehow have editing priveleges and meant to suggest adding the tag to post #7262958, but I actually ended up editing. I'll leave it up to y'all to decide if it's merited but please keep in mind that people like me really don't wanna see this stuff.

Ubaldo_the_Uploader said:

I wouldn't, based on the proportions. One could place that at petite 14-16.

I think even disregarding the proportions, it wouldn't count. The most suggestive thing in the image is a side slit and, while it's easily noticeable, there's not really that much focus on it.

josicret said:

new to this thread but I'm tired of seeing untagged loli. I somehow have editing priveleges and meant to suggest adding the tag to post #7262958, but I actually ended up editing. I'll leave it up to y'all to decide if it's merited but please keep in mind that people like me really don't wanna see this stuff.

All account holders can edit tags here.

I'm not really seeing how this is loli by our standards. She doesn't seem any younger than her normal appearance, which is very much not loli. The only argument I could give in favor of the loli tag is that her foot blocking the view of her proportions makes it slightly more ambiguous, but I'm not convinced that's enough of a justification on its own, especially since it's been used to argue against adding the loli tag in some cases.

I don't know how to stop this post from evading your blacklist without unnecessarily blocking other posts, but remember that adding loli or shota will prevent most viewers from being able to see it. The main purpose of these tags is to appease potential payment processors and prevent the site from being blocked outside of the US. At the same time, if we block every single post that might cause problems, we would have a lot less content available, so we need to maintain a balance. That means we may have content some users may consider to be loli (low lolicon, for example) but can't be tagged as such and thus is harder to blacklist properly.

I'll wait a couple days before removing the tag so others can weigh in unless someone beats me to it.