Gut goes with loli but second opinions with lolis are always needed.
Posted under General
Gut goes with loli but second opinions with lolis are always needed.
post #1298506
I would say she's slightly too old looking for the tag but it never hurts to check.
Skingraft said:
post #1298506
I would say she's slightly too old looking for the tag but it never hurts to check.
I would say your intuition was correct. That body is more than enough to disqualify the loli tag.
saizo0070 said:
post #1298173
Gonna have to say yes here.
0xC0FFEE said:
post #1306087
It's a little bit ambiguous with the oversized head and the obscured silhouette of her body lines. I'm going to go out on a limb and vote no on this one, though.
post #1298173 doesn't look loli to me. Her legs and arms are fairly long and body doesn't look like that of a preadolescent child.
Dunno if loli or petite. Went with former just in case.
post #1314291
my gut's telling me no but im still not quite sure.
pool #6393
Flat chest, no feminine curves, head size in proportion to body indicates childishness, no pubic hair, relatively large eyes in head also a possible sign.
I may be overthinking it, though.
ghostrigger said:
post #1323338
Too worksafe for the tag.
post #1322698
She looks very small and kiddy to me.
lastsinz said:
post #1322698
She looks very small and kiddy to me.
Large head due to art style, petite body but not loli
post #40564 - you can't see much of the boy, but seems shota to me, so I added the tag.
post #21654 - She looks teenaged to me... Can't see breasts, but hips/butt are somewhat rounded. However, I want a second opinion before I remove the loli tag.
Updated by jjj14
post #1332641
Not sure if she's supposed to be bottomless or not or if that matters. I think the artist described it as Schrödinger's panties in the comments.
Updated by Tom23
How about that one ?