Kind of if it was more sexualized, but as is, no.
Posted under General
Freshblink said:
Kind of if it was more sexualized, but as is, no.
She's completely naked and barely covered by suds. If she looks young enough for the loli tag, then it should be added. The only reason I'm not adding it is because it looks like she might have a bit of a chest on her.
FemboyWoody said:
yes
post #10330495, post #10330498, post #10330503, post #10330507, post #10330513, post #10330520.
These are part of the same set. I get why the parent post #7842851 has the loli tag, because there's an erection under clothes. The variants don't have it, but I still want to be sure if they should be tagged loli or not.
CommentaryRequest said:
post #10330495, post #10330498, post #10330503, post #10330507, post #10330513, post #10330520.
These are part of the same set. I get why the parent post #7842851 has the loli tag, because there's an erection under clothes. The variants don't have it, but I still want to be sure if they should be tagged loli or not.
those variants do not need the tag
false positive check on post #7658059
wingdings said:
false positive check on post #7658059
Yeah, that's not even close.
denliner27 said:
I'd say yes; I added the tag unless someone objects
post #10350451 and its variants
CommentaryRequest said:
post #10350451 and its variants
Yes
gxc425 said:
No, breasts are a bit too large in my opinion
post #6850011 is probably a futa bulge on the skirt based on the other posts and the artist's style